Jump to content

Defensive problem


cRi cRi

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone.

 

I would like to ask you guys what is the correct play at trick 2 on that board. Playing matchpoint, you hold :

7642

843

K83

AJ2

 

Lefty opens 1NT(15 -17) and gets to play there.

 

Your partner leads the 3 (4th best) and dummy comes with

 

A1098

J97

76

Q976

 

Dummy plays low, you play the Jack and declarer plays the 8.

 

What now ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call the TD, because partner's played twice to the same trick.

 

On a more serious note I would probably go for a small diamond. I'm not confident of beating the contract but if partner has say Q10xx then we might hold it to just made (2D, 3C and partner has something else).

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a more serious note I would probably go for a small diamond. I'm not confident of beating the contract but if partner has say Q10xx then we might hold it to just made (2D, 3C and partner has something else).

With Q10xx I think he'd have led a diamond, not a club. Also you'd need it to be Q105x, and you'd have to switch to 8.

 

 

K10xx or Kxxx in a minor is an unattractive lead against 1NT. It seems likely that parter is 3334 and declarer is 2452, in which case a diamond switch will just help declarer.

 

It looks a bit odd, but I'd switch to a spade. That doesn't do anything for declarer than he couldn't do for himself, and it will set up a trick if partner has QJx or KJx. I'm not that worried about setting up spade tricks in dummy, because with Kx declarer has no quick entry to dummy, and with Qx he probably won't want to risk ducking the king and then taking a finesse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Q10xx I think he'd have led a diamond, not a club. Also you'd need it to be Q105x, and you'd have to switch to 8.

 

 

K10xx or Kxxx in a minor is an unattractive lead against 1NT. It seems likely that parter is 3334 and declarer is 2452, in which case a diamond switch will just help declarer.

 

It looks a bit odd, but I'd switch to a spade. That doesn't do anything for declarer than he couldn't do for himself, and it will set up a trick if partner has QJx or KJx. I'm not that worried about setting up spade tricks in dummy, because with Kx declarer has no quick entry to dummy, and with Qx he probably won't want to risk ducking the king and then taking a finesse.

 

What are the reasons why leading Q10xx is better than Kxxx against 1NT ? (Playing matchpoint if that's relevant regarding the lead in this case)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...