Chas_P Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 So what? You don't get a refund on the portion of your city taxes that funds the Fire Department just because your house never caught fire. We're part of a society, and if society has a responsibility for something, we pay for it together. That's the "social contract". I understand all that, and I have no problem paying taxes. Over the years there have been times when I was flat broke and paid very little and other times when I made a bunch of money and paid a whole lot. Of the two positions, #2 is my fave. But here's the point: Government has no money of its own. Government cannot give you something that it did not take, by force, from someone else. I think about that every month when I get my Social Security check. And I thank you and Richard for your support. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted March 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 The storm flags are flying!Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 No, that's not my point. The point is that everyone has cognitive biases. But especially, there seems to be nothing humans seem better at than motivated reasoning. Accusing someone of motivated reasoning is about as strong of an accusation as accusing them of breathing air. Here is a good example of a relevant study: https://papers.ssrn....ract_id=2182588 Personally, I have found the world easier to explain once I *started* with the assumption that most reasoning is motivated reasoning - yes, even, gasp, when coming in the most highly respected documents of reasoning the world has seen, i.e. US supreme court opinions. Probably this discussion has about run its course but here is the problem with cognitive bias as an explanation. It's generally used against the other guy. For example, perhaps your use of cognitive bias is a demonstration of cognitive bias. You say that you find it easier to explain the world in those terms. So this gives you a motivation to explain the world in those terms. Desiring an explanation to be correct is where, I think, cognitive bias is said to come from. So why not apply it? I presume you would say that this is not an example of cognitive bias, I might, or might not, agree, but my point is it can be used by anyone anytime for anything. It's a diversion. I do try to see how my view of the world comes about. Back in high school a friend said "I sometimes believe things because I can prove them, but I also sometimes can prove things because I believe them". A good formulation of cognitive bias, c.1955. I believe most people see me as pretty straightforward, they rarely have to wonder just what it is that I meant by what I said. But we all have blind spots. When I misplay a bridge hand, I usually like to sit down and see for myself where I should have, on the evidence, taken a different line. I have little interest in proving myself right, I am interested ni seeing what I missed. I like to work it through. Anyway, I am running out of anything useful to say here. I don't favor reparations, I have said a bit about why, that's pretty much it.I have to add in another true story from my youth. Four of us would get together and play hearts. After one session this guy said "I have the worst luck. You guys know I am smarter than you but I never win". Cognitive bias has been around for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Probably this discussion has about run its course but here is the problem with cognitive bias as an explanation. It's generally used against the other guy. For example, perhaps your use of cognitive bias is a demonstration of cognitive bias. You say that you find it easier to explain the world in those terms. So this gives you a motivation to explain the world in those terms. Desiring an explanation to be correct is where, I think, cognitive bias is said to come from. So why not apply it? But! Where ever I look, I see confirmation bias! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 In a case of 0 degrees of separation, Dennison's shutdown of the government endangered anybody who flew on those Boeing 737 Max planes. Rachel Maddow reported that Boeing and the FAA were negotiating what changes to the software controlling those planes were necessary, and that talks were suspended for 35 days while the Federal government was shut down. Rachel Maddow Draws Devastating Line From Trump’s Shutdown To The Ethiopian Airlines Crash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Am I the only one surprised that Trump is not associated with the college admissions bribery scheme? Or is it just a matter of time before it comes to light (like with Robert Kraft)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 In a case of 0 degrees of separation, Dennison's shutdown of the government endangered anybody who flew on those Boeing 737 Max planes. Rachel Maddow reported that Boeing and the FAA were negotiating what changes to the software controlling those planes were necessary, and that talks were suspended for 35 days while the Federal government was shut down. Rachel Maddow Draws Devastating Line From Trump’s Shutdown To The Ethiopian Airlines CrashI don't think you can pin that one on Trump. As this Feb 3 NYT story explains, Boeing and the FAA's decision to keep pilots in the dark about a change to the flight control system to prevent stalling under certain conditions pre-dates the shutdown and Trump (the FAA certified the 737 MAX on March 8, 2017): The causes of the [October Lion Air crash], which killed 189 people, are still under investigation. Indonesian authorities are studying the cockpit voice recorder for insights into how the pilots handled the emergency, and are examining Lion Air’s long history of maintenance problems. But the tragedy has become a focus of intense interest and debate in aviation circles because of another factor: the determination by Boeing and the F.A.A. that pilots did not need to be informed about a change introduced to the 737’s flight control system for the Max, some software coding intended to automatically offset the risk that the size and location of the new engines could lead the aircraft to stall under certain conditions. That judgment by Boeing and its regulator was at least in part a result of the company’s drive to minimize the costs of pilot retraining. And it appears to have left the Lion Air crew without a full understanding of how to address a malfunction that seems to have contributed to the crash: faulty data erroneously indicating that the plane was flying at a dangerous angle, leading the flight control system to repeatedly push the plane’s nose down. Understanding how the pilots could have been left largely uninformed leads back to choices made by Boeing as it developed the 737 Max more than seven years ago, according to statements from Boeing and interviews with engineers, former Boeing employees, pilots, regulators and congressional aides. Those decisions ultimately prompted the company, regulators and airlines to conclude that training or briefing pilots on the change to the flight control system was unnecessary for carrying out well-established emergency procedures. The story of the change to that system, and how it came to play a central role in the Lion Air crash, shows how safety on modern jetliners is shaped by a complex combination of factors, including fierce industry competition, technological advances and pilot training. It illustrates how, in the rare instances when things go awry, the interplay of those factors can create unintended and potentially fatal consequences. The crash has raised questions about whether Boeing played down or overlooked, largely for cost and competitive reasons, the potential dangers of keeping pilots uninformed about changes to a critical element of the plane’s software. And it has put a new focus on whether the F.A.A. has been aggressive enough in monitoring Boeing in an era when technology has made airliners both remarkably reliable and increasingly complicated. European regulators initially disagreed with the F.A.A.’s judgment about the need for additional training but ultimately went along, a pilot familiar with the certification process said, while regulators in Brazil broke with the F.A.A. and required that pilots be made familiar with the change.To me, it looks like Boeing and the FAA, whose prime directive is safety, put marketing considerations before safety. But yeah, the image of going nose first into the ground to prevent stalling is classic Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Am I the only one surprised that Trump is not associated with the college admissions bribery scheme? Or is it just a matter of time before it comes to light (like with Robert Kraft)? I didn't give any real thought to a DT connection. But it's one of those things that just leaves me stunned. It's hard to know where to begin, but this is what the parents want to teach their kids? From WaPo story Huffman is accused of paying $15,000 — disguised as a charitable donation — to the Key Worldwide Foundation so her oldest daughter could participate in the scam. A confidential informant told investigators that he advised Huffman that he could arrange for a third party to correct her daughter's answers on the SAT after she took it. She ended up scoring a 1420 — 400 points higher than she had gotten on a PSAT taken a year earlier, according to court documents. Huffman also contemplated running a similar scam to help her younger daughter but ultimately did not pursue it, the complaint alleges.It is my great hope that this younger daughter told her mother "Hey mom, let's not". Naive maybe, but I can hope. Not only bribery charges, but trouble with the IRS. Their kids are in a bad spotlight. And all for what? The idiocy of this just overwhelms me. I hope that while the elite colleges are checking out how the kids got admitted they would also look at how the kids passed courses once they got admitted. I did not get the idea that these young people had either the high school training or the willingness to work that would get them through an honest course at a school that had standards. So there is quite a bit to explain, but we can guess at how they got through their courses, and learning the material probably wasn't the route of choice. Well, part of the scam involved athletics. That could explain a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 From How Much Immigration Is Too Much? by David Frum at The Atlantic: If liberals won’t enforce borders, fascists will. We need to make hard decisions now about what will truly benefit current and future Americans.Americans are entitled to consider carefully whom they will number among themselves. They would be irresponsible not to consider this carefully—because all of these expensive commitments must be built on a deep agreement that all who live inside the borders of the United States count as “ourselves.” The years of slow immigration, 1915 to 1975, were also years in which the United States became a more cohesive nation: the years of the civil-rights revolution, the building of a mass middle class, the construction of a national social-insurance system, the projection of U.S. power in two world wars. As immigration has accelerated, the country seems to have splintered apart. Many Americans feel that the country is falling short of its promises of equal opportunity and equal respect. Levels of immigration that are too high only enhance the difficulty of living up to those promises. Reducing immigration, and selecting immigrants more carefully, will enable the country to more quickly and successfully absorb the people who come here, and to ensure equality of opportunity to both the newly arrived and the long-settled—to restore to Americans the feeling of belonging to one united nation, responsible for the care and flourishing of all its people.Frum is the author of Trumpocracy: The Corruption of the American Republic. In 2001 and 2002, he was a speechwriter for President George W. Bush. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted March 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 I don't think you can pin that one on Trump. As this Feb 3 NYT story explains, Boeing and the FAA's decision to keep pilots in the dark about a change to the flight control system to prevent stalling under certain conditions pre-dates the shutdown and Trump (the FAA certified the 737 MAX on March 8, 2017): To me, it looks like Boeing and the FAA, whose prime directive is safety, put marketing considerations before safety. But yeah, the image of going nose first into the ground to prevent stalling is classic Trump. In true isolationist tradition, the U.S. is now. after Canada banned it, the only country allowing this plane to fly. Perhaps Wilbur Ross is shorting the flight insurance industry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Frum is the author of Trumpocracy: The Corruption of the American Republic. In 2001 and 2002, he was a speechwriter for President George W. Bush. And a recent immigrant to America from Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Regarding Boeing, FAA etc. This is completely crazy, and something has to be done. That much is obvious. On the pBS Newshour last night they had a guy explaining that the FAA lacks the resources and the expertise to go up against Boeing, they just can't handle the job. Maybe so. Of course everyone else can look at the obvious and say that Boeing changed the design, after which two planes went down, pretty much in the same way, and in a manner that fits in with potential problems in the design and/or software. So nobody is putting their own kid on the plane, and so the FAA needs to shut it down until there is a better understanding.As to Trump, if he is serious about using presidential powers to intervene in a national emergency, this would seem to qualify. My idea of an emergency is an unexpected and severe problem that has to be dealt with quickly and for which the usual administrative approach is too slow.. Redesigned planes falling out of the sky would be an example. This has nothing to do with liking Trump or disliking Trump. The FAA is looking awful. Maybe the PBS guy was right and they simply are not up for the job. This needs to be fixed in the long term. The immediate problem has to be dealt with more quickly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted March 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 House Resolution 1. The so-called "For the People Act." It includes proposals such as public financing of campaigns, ending Citizens United, requiring presidential candidates to disclose tax returns, automatic voter registration, making Election Day a federal holiday and ending partisan gerrymandering. When asked why this legislation was not coming for a vote to the floor of the senate, Mitch McConnell said, "Because I'm the guy who decides what we vote on." To that I say: not for much longer. Kick them out! Kick them out! Kick them out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted March 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 This just in. Paul Manafort, campaign manager for Individual-1, has been sentenced to 7 1/2 years in prison. At the same time, the state of New York has also indicted him on numerous state charges - which is indeed interesting, as it gives the appearance that the office of the special counsel and the New York state AG are working in unison to quash any pardon attempts (the president cannot pardon state crimes). Edit: NYTPaul J. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, has been charged in New York with mortgage fraud and more than a dozen other state felonies, the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., said Wednesday, an effort to ensure he will still face prison time if Mr. Trump pardons him for his federal crimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 I don't think you can pin that one on Trump. As this Feb 3 NYT story explains, Boeing and the FAA's decision to keep pilots in the dark about a change to the flight control system to prevent stalling under certain conditions pre-dates the shutdown and Trump (the FAA certified the 737 MAX on March 8, 2017): To me, it looks like Boeing and the FAA, whose prime directive is safety, put marketing considerations before safety. But yeah, the image of going nose first into the ground to prevent stalling is classic Trump. Dennison took over government on January 20, 2017 and among the first things he did was to start deregulating government agencies so there wouldn't be so much oversight on private industry. For what is is worth, Patrick Shanahan is the acting Secretary of Defense and before that was the Deputy Secretary of Defense after a long career at Boeing, and current Boeing CEO Muilenburg personally called Dennison and vouched for the safety of the 737 Max planes. This is something that a Congressional oversight committee needs to investigate since it is obvious to all that the White House will do nothing. BOEING CEO DENNIS MUILENBURG CALLED DONALD TRUMP TO KEEP THE 737 MAX 8 PLANES FLYING: REPORT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 This is something that a Congressional oversight committee needs to investigate since it is obvious to all that the White House will do nothing.Indeed. It looks like House Transportation Committee Chair Defazio (D-OR) is (finally) on the same wavelength. Edit: BTW, Mitch McConnell's wife Elaine Chao runs the Department of Transportation. No doubt she will get to the bottom of this, one way or another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjbrr Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 This just in. Paul Manafort, campaign manager for Individual-1, has been sentenced to 7 1/2 years in prison. At the same time, the state of New York has also indicted him on numerous state charges - which is indeed interesting, as it gives the appearance that the office of the special counsel and the New York state AG are working in unison to quash any pardon attempts (the president cannot pardon state crimes). Edit: NYT Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance has a history of collecting bribes to drop prosecutions, including slam-dunk felony fraud indictments for Ivanka and Trump Jr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Let's see, Individual-1 populism = $1.5 trillion tax cut for the wealthy and an $845 billion cut to health care for the average person. Oh, I get it - we're all supposed to become Christian Scientists: problem solved! Dennison is just getting started. Trump said he wouldn’t cut Medicaid, Social Security, and Medicare. His 2020 budget cuts all 3. President Donald Trump’s 2020 budget breaks one of his biggest campaign promises to voters: that he would leave Medicaid, Social Security, and Medicare untouched. “I’m not going to cut Social Security like every other Republican and I’m not going to cut Medicare or Medicaid,” Trump told the Daily Signal, a conservative publication affiliated with the Heritage Foundation, in 2015. In isolation, the Medicaid budget cuts amount to $1.5 trillion over 10 years, but looked at in the context of the new block grant as well the work requirements and ACA cuts, the cuts round out to about $777 billion — which could leave millions more uninsured. The budget also continues an attack on Social Security, including to a program that gives assistance to those who have disabilities that prevent them from being in the workforce. In all, the cuts to Social Security amount to $25 billion over the next 10 years, cutting roughly $10 billion from the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program More Dennison lies about not cutting social programs. Are we up to 10,000 or 20,000 lies since he was elected? :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 I see Trump decided to ground the 737 MAX a few hours ago. Good for him. Good take on this in this afternoon's NYT by James Hall who was the chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board from 1994 to 2001. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Am I the only one surprised that Trump is not associated with the college admissions bribery scheme? Or is it just a matter of time before it comes to light (like with Robert Kraft)? Well, this latest college admissions bribery scandal is probably new and unrelated to anything that happened 50+ years ago (or 20+ years ago in the case of children Ivanka and Dumb and Dumber). But, make no mistake. Things like this have been going on ever since there were more applicants for a school than openings. Dennison had such mediocre grades and test scores that he had Michael Cohen threaten to sue anybody with access to them to prevent them from leaking. How did he get into an Ivy league college with mediocre or even below average grades and test scores? Hmmm, Daddy Fred Trump paid Dennison the equivalent of a million dollars a year as a kid. A few million well placed donation dollars would certainly be enough to get even a dotard into a distinguished University. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 I see Trump decided to ground the 737 MAX a few hours ago. Basically the last country in the world to ground 737 Max planes. Many countries even disallowed flyovers over their airspace, in addition to landings and takeoffs. Next week, I predict Dennison will be bragging how he was the first one in the world to react to the crashes of those planes to protect the American people. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted March 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Basically the last country in the world to ground 737 Max planes. Many countries even disallowed flyovers over their airspace, in addition to landings and takeoffs. Next week, I predict Dennison will be bragging how he was the first one in the world to react to the crashes of those planes to protect the American people. It actually wouldn't surprise me to learn it was done to distract attention from the Manafort verdict. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted March 13, 2019 Report Share Posted March 13, 2019 Upon further reflection, I think you can put the delay on grounding the 737 MAX on Trump. He picked Elaine Chao as Secretary of Transportation and like so many of his cabinet picks she has turned out to be as much of a swamp creature as SC-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted March 14, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2019 It appears that Big Dick Toilet Salesman Matt Whitaker lied to Congress, after all: Speaking to reporters after a two-hour meeting with Whitaker, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) presented Whitaker’s closed-door comments as a contradiction of his public testimony from February, during which Whitaker said Trump never expressed his dissatisfaction with Cohen for pleading guilty to various financial crimes and lying to Congress. When asked at that hearing whether he had ever discussed the Cohen case with Trump, Whitaker refused to answer the question. “Unlike in the hearing room, Mr. Whitaker did not deny that the president called him to discuss the Michael Cohen case and personnel decisions in the Southern District,” Nadler said, referring to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which brought the case against Cohen. Here's what Individual-1 said about him at his appointment: by twitter, of course :( Donald J. Trump✔@realDonaldTrump · Nov 7, 2018 We are pleased to announce that Matthew G. Whitaker, Chief of Staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions at the Department of Justice, will become our new Acting Attorney General of the United States. He will serve our Country well.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.