Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3c

 

Not much defense p is a passed hand and aiming for spades is a super small tiny window to worry about. It is all too easy for the opps to have game if not slam and at the very worst 3c is a decent lead director. Passing under these conditions is a head-in-the-sand philosophy:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I open 3.

 

In third seat after 2 passes, my goal is to disrupt the opps as much as possible without sticking my neck out too far. 3 accomplishes this.

 

It is not my goal to find the best possible contract, but rather the best contract possible. Could we have a spade fit? Sure we could. But it is impractical to look for it.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matchpoints 3rd in favourable opps aren't great but lefty is considerably better than righty. two passes to you

7 5 4 3 2 5 6 A Q J T 8 6

you play 2/1 3 weak 2

I rank

  1. 3 = PRE. holding no bar to 3rd-seat pre-empt.
  2. Pass = NAT. Gives opponents a lot of exploration room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4C

 

looks like you're going to have to change your vote to 5c now, Jinksy :P

 

btw this hand was from a couple of weeks ago I opened 3c fwiw I was just thinking about it yesterday for some reason

 

full hand for those interested:

https://app.pianola.net/Results/Session54853/Travellers/25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me primitive but I pass.

 

-5 card spades on the side is way too much for me to open 3.

-1 opening is not even a lead director.

-My hand perfectly fits in the definition of a pass.

 

Really? I have an agreement with partner that a 3rd seat 1 opener that is revealed to be weak later in the auction is most often a strong lead indicator, otherwise why bother. You haven't impeded their bidding and with marginal standard openings and poor clubs we can choose a decent 4-card major. Works out most of the time.

 

I can't stand to pass at these colors or to miss spades at mp's so 1 for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to 3rd seat preempts, the only rule is 'there are no rules.'. You can pretty much do whatever you want, so a theoretically questionable bid becomes desirable if you think it rates to grant a tactical advantage.

 

The example hand is certainly an odd one. In all honesty I think I would try 4 (IMPs or matchpoints). Counting losers this is 'ballpark'. I'll have another guess to make if the opponents get to 4 (how they get there affects my choice) but for now I'll try to buy (read: 'steal') it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...