Agreements #1

[lmilne]

I found a couple of holes in our notes leading up to the Bowl. Help me out with what you think is expert standard:

 

What system do you play after (3♠)-3NT? What about after (3♣)-3NT?

[mikeh]

4♣ asks for a description of the overcall and overcaller bids as follows:

 

4 of a suit (not the suit opened by preemptor) shows an overcall based on possession of a long, strong suit (plus, obviously, a stopper...the extent of side values is down to style)

 

4 of opener's suit shows clubs

 

4N is 16-19 balanced or semi-balanced

 

5N is 20+ balanced or semi-balanced

 

 

4D/H/S are transfers...never transfer to opener's suit, so we only need 3 transfers...a transfer into opener's suit is actually a transfer to the suit beyond opener's suit

 

4N is minors

 

we don't have stayman, but after this start to the auction, playing a 4-4 major suit fit is not that desirable on most layouts.

[gnasher]

4♣ is a range and hand-type ask. I've played lots of different responses. It comes up so rarely that I've no idea what's best. One option is:

- 4♦ = extra values, balanced, forcing to 4NT.

- 4M = minimum, balanced, 4-card suit

- 4NT =minimum without a major

- Cue, if available = one-suited

If there's no cue-bid available, you bid 4NT on a minimum one-suiter and 5 something with extra values.

 

4♦ is a signoff in a major or some two-suiter. Partner normally bids 4♥.

 

4M is a natural NF slam-try.

 

Edit: This (especially the 4♣ structure) isn't intended as "expert standard", it's just what I currently play in one partnership.

[Finch]

I don't think there is a standard. We've just changed ours (and then added a different set by a passed hand)

[jallerton]

I found a couple of holes in our notes leading up to the Bowl. Help me out with what you think is expert standard:

 

What system do you play after (3♠)-3NT? What about after (3♣)-3NT?

 

It's also worth discussing what you play after (2♠)-3NT.

[DinDIP]

I found a couple of holes in our notes leading up to the Bowl. Help me out with what you think is expert standard:

 

What system do you play after (3♠)-3NT? What about after (3♣)-3NT?

 

I think the important things are to be able to enquire about the nature of partner's overcall (as 3N can be bid on such a wide variety of hands) and to have two ways to get to 4M and, though it matter less, 5m (one to play, the other a NF slam try). Stayman is of limited value but some folk do ask about five-card majors.

 

A relatively simple scheme is:

4♣ = inquiry.

. . . 4♦ = BALish, 16-20 [4M/5m = NF slam try]

. . . 4M/5m = 7+card (semi-) solid suit

. . . 4N = BALish, 21+ [5x = TFR]

4R = TFR, either to play or strong slam try [4N = RKC (or step = Kickback, if that's what you use), other = SPL/void/suit/cue according to preference]

4♠/4N = TFR to C/D, either to play or strong slam try

 

Alternatively, you might decide that you want to distinguish between one-suited and two-suited slam tries rather than mild and serious tries.

 

If you decide that you rarely overcall 3N with a long major you could use the 4M responses to the 4♣ inquiry to show length in the corresponding minor so as to allow you to play in 4N -- if you think the memory load is worth it.

 

Similarly, you could vary your agreements according to what the opponents opened, whether advancer is a passed hand, and whether 3N was a simple or a jump overcall, but I'm yet to be convinced the gains are worth the memory load.

[Bende]

I don't think there is a standard. We've just changed ours (and then added a different set by a passed hand)

 

One partner and I agreed to play what you played earlier (at least what you posted in some thread) though it has yet to come up. I would be interested to hear what you play now.

[kenrexford]

If Opener has a minor, 4C as one or both majors helps. Partner picks the major he prefers, assuming 55 in the majors, by bidding 4H with heart preference, 4D with spade preference (to get under 4H if Advancer has just long hearts). 4D by Advancer, instead, asks for the nature of the overcall, partner bidding 4S with balanced and 4 spades, 4N if balanced and 4 hearts, 4H if balanced with no major, or long in the other minor, 4S asking which. Advancer can also bid 4H or 4S with slam interest and that major (4C with one major is weaker).

[jimmyg010]

My partner and I have agreed this. Is it any good?

 

Competing over 3 Level Pre-empts

 

- X: T/O.

- 3NT: Natural. Then:

...- 4♣: 12+, range enquiry.

......- 4♦: 15-17. Then 4♠ is a puppet to 4NT, either to play or to find a suit (bid up the line). 4NT is quantitative invite, which can be accepted by bidding suits up the line.

......- 4♥: 18-20. Then 4♠ is a puppet to 4NT, etc...

......- 4♠: 21-22. Then bid suits up the line.

......- 4NT: Running suit.

......- 6NT: 23-24.

......- 7NT: 25+. (Maybe these last two are a bit silly. With 23+ bal, probably better to double and then (jump) bid NT?)

...- 4♦/♥/♠: Transfers, either to play or with a slam try. If the opponents opened 3m, 4♠ is a transfer to the other minor. If they opened 3M, 4♠ is a transfer to diamonds and transferring to their major is for clubs.

- Direct cue-bid: Michael’s.

- Suit overcall: Natural, non-forcing.

- 4NT: Strong 5-5 minors.