Jinksy Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 [hv=pc=n&n=sa9654haqdj5432cj&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=p1n(12-14)]133|200[/hv] Butler IMPs. Are you more afraid of bidding or missing game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 Abstain, don't like your system. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinksy Posted July 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 If you tell me to play Multi-Landy, I will spit on your system card :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 Are you more afraid of bidding or missing game?Can't I be afraid of neither and want to compete for the partscore? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillPatch Posted July 18, 2015 Report Share Posted July 18, 2015 And the safest way of competing for the partscore is 2♦ assuming a natural system such as Landy or Mosher(all bids natural). Why did the poll not contain choice of 2♦? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akwoo Posted July 19, 2015 Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 I bid 2♠. But I would have liked to be playing some system that allows showing two suiters so that partner has a way of telling what ♦KQx ♣xxx or ♦xxx ♣KQx is worth in an invitational hand with spade support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinksy Posted July 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 And the safest way of competing for the partscore is 2♦ assuming a natural system such as Landy or Mosher(all bids natural). Why did the poll not contain choice of 2♦? I thought about it, but didn't think anyone would want to. Should have known - it's added now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts