barmar Posted July 17, 2015 Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 I'm not sure what gnasher was going on about. I looked at the raw source of the post he quoted, it didn't use an irritating font. Some words were in bold-italic, that's it. Irritating was when Lurpoa used to post everything in large Comic Sans with her trademark big hearts strewn about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pran Posted July 17, 2015 Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 You are preventing the establishment of a revoke -- a separate irregularity. You may or may not be drawing attention to an irregularity already committed. Maybe he actually was out of the suit.Some irregularities cannot be legally prevented, revoke is one of them because you cannot know that a revoke is in progress until it is actually committed. You don't even then know if it is a revoke until you have verified whether he is really void in the suit. And that is where Law 61 is relevant. It does not allow a player to prevent a revoke from being committed but it allows him to prevent it from becoming established. However, if you for instance notice your partner (or any player) about to pull a card from his hand when you know it is not his turn to play you have every right to stop him in the act. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted July 19, 2015 Report Share Posted July 19, 2015 I'm not sure what gnasher was going on about. I looked at the raw source of the post he quoted, it didn't use an irritating font. Some words were in bold-italic, that's it. Irritating was when Lurpoa used to post everything in large Comic Sans with her trademark big hearts strewn about. Irritation is in the eye of the beholder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.