thorvald Posted July 3, 2015 Report Share Posted July 3, 2015 I was looking the the BBO-advanced FD-file, and noticed the following lines 001N2C{NOT FOR MAJORS}2D{NOT FOR MAJORS}=NYYYYYYA08Jacoby transfer, 5+!hs and a little later in the file 001N2C{LANDY - FOR MAJORS}2D{LANDY - FOR MAJORS}=NYYYYYYA08Jacoby transfer, 5+!hs Ignoring the fact it is strange playing transfer after 1NT-(2♣) showing boths majors, it could look like we should be able to define the same bid with different meanings based on some kind of explanation marked with {}, but I have no idea about how that information can be provided to FD when the bid should be explained - Anyone got any ideas ? Thorvald Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted July 6, 2015 Report Share Posted July 6, 2015 Ignoring the fact it is strange playing transfer after 1NT-(2♣) showing boths majors,Thorvaldnot to turn this into a bidding question but... 2♣ is often 5-4 some even 4-4 so our side can have majority of a major suit. Also this may be a prelude to bidding out shape by offering NT or a second suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorvald Posted July 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 23, 2015 not to turn this into a bidding question but... 2♣ is often 5-4 some even 4-4 so our side can have majority of a major suit. Also this may be a prelude to bidding out shape by offering NT or a second suit. I am much more interested in the syntax, than the actual bidding - Nobody knows what the intentions of this was ?Thorvald Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts