Jump to content

looking for Sponsor/pay students


Recommended Posts

My name is Sherman Gao, live in Pomona, CA. now looking for sponsor/pay students for tournaments.

here's what can I do for you: no matter what level you are right now, if you want to win some MPs, I'll play the way you play right now and win in any tournament pairs game with you, but however, if you want to improve your game and win bigger tournament, like do well in NABC+, I can help you improve your game by practice online and teach you everything you need to learn.

Free try online practice ACBL speedball game

email Shermangao73@hotmail.com to arrange a time,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be a good idea to list your credentials.

 

And to retract the promise to win a pairs game! No one can guarantee that. I have played in pairs games where I am in by far the strongest partnership in the room, and not won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be a good idea to list your credentials.

 

And to retract the promise to win a pairs game! No one can guarantee that. I have played in pairs games where I am in by far the strongest partnership in the room, and not won.

So far I never lose in a tournament pairs game with any partner, I came US about 2 years. not lose mean win some points, not every times 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that as long as you can win masterpoints by placing 43rd out of 58 pairs with a 45.69% game in a Stratified event, your record may stay intact:

http://www.bridgeresults.net/res_event.cgi?eventid=18488

that's a 2 sections game, my client is an old man and he is get tired in 2nd section. however, we did win s points because 1st section.

even playing with very beginner player, I do win every time some points in all tournament pairs game. in 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

win mean win points, as my clients usually want to.

You may be a student of Lewis Carroll

 

http://www.bartleby.com/73/2019.html

 

Absent clarification, what is up for being won may, it seems, be open to interpretation.

 

Arguably, it should be obvious that you do not mean coming in first place, as it should be obvious that no-one would be able to make such a guarantee.

 

On the other hand, it is virtually impossible for a low-flight player to enter an event and not win masterpoints. I am pretty confident that any of my beginners would win masterpoints partnering, say, PhilG007.

 

It might be reasonable for a potential client on the Clapham Omnibus, on reading the promise to have an expectation that provides something beyond the inevitable. But legally I would rate it as simply an advertising "puff", and would be distinguished from Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

 

It might be reasonable to expect a claim in an advert to be relevant to your decision whether to engage, but that is pretty naïve. The public have over recent decades developed sophisticated psychological defences to advertising claims, and advertisers up their game to compensate. Look back at any advert from 10 years ago and you would be aghast now that anyone was ever taken in by them when originally aired.

 

Guinness were good at this sort of thing. They ran a campaign once that advertised that all of their bottles were sterilised before bottling. It sounded good and was effective in boosting sales. And yet all bottles in all competing products are sterilised before deployment, so the claim while both true and worthless in reality was an effective ploy.

 

Likewise, my bosses advertise that they offer Capital Gains Tax planning and compliance services. In practice all of our competitors also provide those services. But it is amazing how much business we picked up simply by including it in the ad where our competitors did not.

 

It does have the potential to backfire when called on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed Sherman need clarify his winning theory. Regretfully he is not known how to promote himself. As one of his students, I would like to clarify some of his specialty aspects in bridge.

 

First of all, I am a beginner of bridge play when I met him, most of conventions and card play techniques I didn't know.

 

1. Conventions. He is the one who knows most conventions, where and when to use those conventions. I learned Multi 2D, Last Train to Clarcsville and Lack wood, Modified Woolsey system against NT, Suctions etc from him. They are very useful when you compete at the NABC+ event.

 

2. Robot play at BBO. I watched him playing Robot game at BBO. Really amazing winning. Link below is one of his record:

http://webutil.bridgebase.com/v2/news_fetch.php?id=2571

 

3. Pair and team play techniques. I played with him for several Regional and National events. He showed a lot techniques towards pair and team game differently. I followed his instructions and find out they are quite useful when I compete at the tournaments.

 

Links below are a few his achievements:

 

1. http://www.bridgeresults.net/res_event.cgi?eventid=18518

Top 5 of 47 tables

 

2. http://web2.acbl.org/tournaments/Results/NABC/NABC142.HTM

1st place Under "Tue-Wed KO Bracket 5 - 16 Tables"

 

If you are looking to get better in bridge, learn more conventions, and know more bridge techniques, I would recommend you learn from him. If you already advanced and knows what he knows, definitely he is not the right choice for you.

 

Hope everyone would do better and enjoy bridge play everyday!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...