Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes in most jurisdictions, since 2 doesn't really promise any substantial number of diamonds. Most such "pass or correct" bids are alertable.

2d does promise a suit and the other suit would be one of the majors. I think you got DONT confused with Cappelletti.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2d does promise a suit and the other suit would be one of the majors. I think you got DONT confused with Cappelletti.

No. It was not about a 2 ovecall, it was about a 2 response to a 2 overcall. The 2 bid showed clubs and another. 2 is nonforcing relay, asking for overcaller's second suit. It will usually be based on three or more diamonds but (54)22 with a weak 5-card suit is certainly possible.

 

I can't believe there are any jurisdictions in which such a bid is not alertable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to alert 2c and explain, if asked : p promises 5+ clubs and 4+ cards in a higher suit.

 

When advancer bids 2d, overcaller has to alert and explain, if asked : p is ready

to play in d, h and sp.

Alert, yes. Those explanations only apply if that's his partnership agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To make it esier on partner, i think to promise 5+ in 1rst suit is more efficient.

 

If you can have 4-5 either way, partner has an insoluble problem, like those people who Michael with 5-4. Their partner having to guess with 3-3 will end up in 4-3 fit instead of 5-3.

 

Now in balance, you can have 4-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...