aguahombre Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 At MPs, I would bid 3♠, but at IMPs (and this is IMPs) I would make sure we get to 4♠. Riknon vul at IMP pairs, to be exact; I believe that makes it pretty much like a MP decision to do better than the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesleyC Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 This hand is an extremely obvious super-accept. In a pickup partnership I'd try 4C but without agreements anything other than 3S is fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phoenix214 Posted May 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 A pretty interesting discussion:In real life partner had -♠:QT6432♥:T7♦:K8♣:A92Intending to try for 6S. The problem as it is. If the hand is played by the 2NT opener, then 6♠ is good, if diamond ace is one-side or if no diamond lead.If the spade hand plays then 6♠ is basically cold. I was mostly curious if somebody would find this as a problem or not. As the cards were, diamond ace was off-side, and we had a diamond lead(Although we finished up in 4♠) we still lost lots of imps because for most tables the auction starts 1♣-1♠, and now they have right-sided their slam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Haha it would not have helped me. In most strong club partnerships I play 1H response to 1C as a transfer to spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurtGodel Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 I think we can eliminate 3♠ immediately, partner can put down a balanced yarborough and game will have play. E.g. partner has xxxxx xxx xx xxx and game is still Q♠ coming down and A♣ onside, yes this isn't great but it's still about 25%. Shuffle a card xxxxx xxx x xxxx and suddenly game is now either Q♠ coming down or A♣ onside, which is pretty good. Giving a sixth spade et cetera are all ways to make game better than 50% In terms of super accepting: I don't really want to bid diamonds as partner might think something like Qx is useful, but the holding we really want them to have is x. 3NT has the big advantage of hearing 4♣, over which we can bid 4♥ - showing our lack of diamond control, now if partner has the diamond king they can right side, and they will feel very good about a diamond stiff. Over 4♦, you can still try 4♥. I'm sure if P has ♦AK and ♠Q they will bid 5♦, if they take control with key card we are also happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.