Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'll start by asking what the double means.

 

If its penalty pass looks interesting but if it's responsive then I'll bid 2 but ask partner after the hand if he thinks 3 is blocking (I vote no).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll start by asking what the double means.

 

If its penalty pass looks interesting but if it's responsive then I'll bid 2 but ask partner after the hand if he thinks 3 is blocking (I vote no).

 

"maximum pass" apparently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass looks to me like a very random shot at a top or a bottom. Certainly as long as the opponents are still on lead at trick 1, they will see they are in cashout mode.

 

Call me simple-minded, but I have a minimum with 6 hearts. I rebid 2. If they want to bid spades, they can bid spades. I may not win the event on this hand but I won't lose it on this hand either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see any point in opening this hand 1 third in, esp favourable. I'm probably opening 2, and maybe 3, depending on how much the opps look willing to be pushed around.

 

We can't imagine game opposite a passed hand unless he's max, good fitting and with a side shortage, in which case he'll surely look at it even after a preemptive opening, so why give the opps extra space?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2h

 

One cannot win every board. 2h is unlikely to cost us the match (jdonn) and it is a much much much safer approach than passing 1n (which will be defended double dummy).

 

Having said this I also feel 1h is a sort of waste when game will rarely be much better than 50% and usually significantly less. 3n would probably depend on a favorable lead even if partner had a max. IMHO I would not worry about game and just open 3h. It will virtually never be played x and thus any penalty incurred would be hugely unlikely to cost us the match. The upsdie of 3h is that we might win the bidding outright or cause the opps to misjudge. That's a lot of upside vs not much risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can the advancer's double really mean 'max pass'? I can't visualize a hand where the advancer would want to do that when - say - a hypothetical 2 would send the same message. Partner obviously does not have five spades so the opps have eight.

 

Under ordinary circumstances - like when the second double is competitive - I'd bid 2 and be done with it, but maybe the aggressor will pass and partner has seven tricks on tap.

 

Granted, this may not be 'good bridge'...but sometimes good matchpoints is bad bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

W/r at mp you hold

 

Tx

Akqjtx

Xx

Jxx

 

The bidding goes p (p) 1h (x) 1n (x)

 

1n is non forcing

 

What's best now just want to test my thinking

 

 

Sorry for no diagram on phone

 

Eagles

 

Depending on the vulnerability,the choice is between 2 and 3 Whoever holds this

hand must not allow themselves to be seduced by all the pretty pictures.Partner has shown a limited hand. Bid boldly but play safe.

 

 

"Any fool can take tricks with Aces and Kings. The true expert shows their worth by how he handles the

2's and 3's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those nervous of putting this hand down in a doubled contract, our trick target is 6, since -100 rates to be a good result. Since we can achieve that opposite the monster that is:

 

xxx

xx

Axxx

Txxx

 

Then its difficult for me to believe it is that wild a gamble to pass. And if the opponents remove the double, we have lost nothing - it's not as if we are going to buy the hand in 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...