Options after lead-directing double on hand w/ slam potential

[bd71]

Assumed agreements: 2/1, Non-Serious 3N, 1430, cue-bids below game are 1st/2nd round controls, cue-bids above game are only 1st round controls

 

[hv=pc=n&s=saqj2hkq432dk2c32&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1cp1hp3hp3s(1st%2F2nd%20rd%20control)p4c(1st%2F2nd%20rd%20control%20%26%20slam%20interest)d]133|200[/hv]

 

Exact hand details aren't relevant, but the key points here are (a) you are very interested in a heart slam, (b) you have two club losers in your hand, (c ) all other suits are controlled.

 

In this situation, there's obviously a concern that partner has only the ♣K and we could be off the first two to ♣AQ with East.

 

Questions for the experts:

 

1. Do you just ignore this and trust that much/most of the time partner will have the ♣A and East is doubling with secondary club honors?

 

2. After the double, do you have a way to check back w/ partner about whether his club control is the ♣A?

 

3. Do you have methods to both do #2 AND get partner to play 6N if he only holds the ♣K?

[masse24]

I pass, allowing partner to describe his/her hand. Partner's redouble will show ♣A.

[WesleyC]

There is plenty of room for complex agreements in this spot and I recently read an interesting method in Kit Woolsey's "Kit's Korner" series.

 

http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/that-little-extra/

 

In a pickup partnership, masse24's suggestion seems obvious, start with a pass and leave room for partner to clarify. Holding the ♣A they can redouble, holding ♣Q or worst they will sign off and with the ♣K they might even offer NT as an alternative strain.

 

On a related note: It's common to invert the meanings of 3S/3NT this situation when you're dealing with hearts. I've been using that agreement for a while and think its definitely an improvement.

[PhantomSac]

Since partner is known to not hold shortness and is known to hold the A or K then over pass partner can XX with the ace, sign off with just the K, and bid 4D with the KQ.