camilleln Posted April 18, 2015 Report Share Posted April 18, 2015 1 ♦ : 1 ♠ :2 ♥ : ? We play that unless agreeing to hearts with a 3 ♥ bid, anything else other than 2 ♠ would deny having 5 spades in our lebensohl agreements. Responder shows 8+ hcp. With this agreement 3 ♦ would deny having 5 spades. However, if having 6 clubs and 5 spades would it make more sense for responder to bid 2 ♠ or 3 ♣ in this auction with 8 hcp? It would be highly suggestive of a 6-5 hand since we can transfer to clubs and bid nt with a balanced hand?Thank you .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted April 18, 2015 Report Share Posted April 18, 2015 Yes it makes sense but you will have to bid the spades again since you coud also have had a 4126 with sstrong spades. With shortness in hearts I think it is better to try to make opener declare 3nt since the auction indicates a major suit lead. But are you sure that 2nt followed by 3nt shows long clubs? I would think that with 4324 you normally take the slow route and that a direct 3nt shows a mild alam try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesleyC Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 1 ♦ : 1 ♠ :2 ♥ : ? We play that unless agreeing to hearts with a 3 ♥ bid, anything else other than 2 ♠ would deny having 5 spades in our lebensohl agreements. Responder shows 8+ hcp. With this agreement 3 ♦ would deny having 5 spades. Admittedly I'm not really answering your question, but I think your issues stem from the agreement: "anything else other than 2 ♠ would deny having 5 spades." After any positive advance, opener has room to bid 3S and confirm spade support so showing a 5th spade immediately is mostly unnecessary. Using 2S to suggest spades as a potential contract opposite Hx (or even less in a pinch) feels far more valuable. You might still bid 2S on an appropriate hand with a chunky 5c suit, e.g. [KQT9x x Ax xxxxx], but on a hand like [Jxxxx x Ax KQTxx] or the 5/6 that you're suggesting in the OP, you need to be able to show your clubs right away or you'll never get the chance. As a final aside, a couple of years ago I switched from a more complex system after reverses to the one line agreement : "After a reverse, first step is artificial and weak, all other bids are natural(ish) and G/F." I was skeptical at first, but it's proved to be extremely effective. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted April 19, 2015 Report Share Posted April 19, 2015 1 ♦ : 1 ♠ :2 ♥ : ? We play that unless agreeing to hearts with a 3 ♥ bid, anything else other than 2 ♠ would deny having 5 spades in our lebensohl agreements. Responder shows 8+ hcp. With this agreement 3 ♦ would deny having 5 spades. However, if having 6 clubs and 5 spades would it make more sense for responder to bid 2 ♠ or 3 ♣ in this auction with 8 hcp? It would be highly suggestive of a 6-5 hand since we can transfer to clubs and bid nt with a balanced hand?Thank you .... with 6clubs and 5s and roughly 8 hcp I have a problem hand I cannot show this--------2s shows 5spades and less than 103c=art and gf often 5s and 9+/ or clubs and gf or other gf2nt=art and weakish I must make a choice and live with it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.