helene_t Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 It remains to be seen whether that would result in the best contract vis-a-vis the other partnership agreements! I assume not, otherwise there would be no point in these other arrangements.I wouldn't be so sure about that. Many of us like playing fancy stuff for the sake of it, even if natural methods could be equally effective :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugabugger Posted May 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 call me crazy but I bid 4nt. My p could not possibly pass and therefore replied 5♠ thinking I would pass. After careful consideration I rose to 7 ♣ I ruffed the heart lead with Q ♣ in my hand played 2 rounds of ♣ to partners AK. ♣ split 2-2 . I returned to my J ♣ then played J ♦ The queen rose to cover it and the singleton K fell on my partner's A. with opps having only the 9 ♦ remaining I ran all ♦ then finished with the A ♠ in partner's hand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahydra Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 call me crazy but I bid 4nt. My p could not possibly pass and therefore replied 5♠ thinking I would pass. After careful consideration I rose to 7 ♣ 4NT pick-a-minor I can sort of understand, but 7C makes absolutely no sense. What's to say partner even has a club fit, let alone three first-round controls, the CK and fitting diamond values? If you think 5S is 2 with Q, it surely has to be with spades as trumps, and then you're lucky not to find partner with AKQxxxx x Kxx xx. I love how so many people called this earlier on in the thread :) Reminds me of the infamous 6D episode from years ago. ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 call me crazy but I bid 4nt. My p could not possibly pass and therefore replied 5♠ thinking I would pass. After careful consideration I rose to 7 ♣ I ruffed the heart lead with Q ♣ in my hand played 2 rounds of ♣ to partners AK. ♣ split 2-2 . I returned to my J ♣ then played J ♦ The queen rose to cover it and the singleton K fell on my partner's A. with opps having only the 9 ♦ remaining I ran all ♦ then finished with the A ♠ in partner's hand Wow great defence. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 5d Even if rho is gambling they have won and we know it. 4H should make with ease their way and 5d really just should not go down more than 500. An immediate 5d would have been better if available (not available to me). There is an ocean of difference btn the club and the dia suit so trying to bring clubs into the picture is just far too scary. While we cannot guarantee setting even 7h the odds of the opps managing to find a making slam are fairly small and pushing them up even 1 level could reap a huge reward for very small risk. The worst part is that how well this fares on this particular hand does not matter much. It would probably take a ton of poor results to convince me 5d was an inferior idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 They vul. LHO deals. You hold ♠ x ♥- ♦ J 10 x x x x x x ♣ Q J x x (Pass) 1♠ (2♥) Pass(Pass) 2♠ (4♥) ?? check out my non fiction books on kindle Gary Margrove ugabugger@yahoo.com. I shall send one of my kindle books by email FREE to the person who gives me the correct answer IMO 5♦ = 10, Pass = 9, 4N = 6, 4♠ = 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 IMO 5♦ = 10, Pass = 9, 4N = 6, 4♠ = 5. Nigel, I have meant to say this for awhile: surely every potential call cannot have an expectation of at least average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted May 7, 2015 Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 Nigel, I have meant to say this for awhile: surely every potential call cannot have an expectation of at least average. No -- nor do I think that the chosen bid has a 100% expectation :). The simple scheme isThe bid you choose = 10, Bids you consider that you think might work = 5-9.Bids you consider or others choose that you think won't work = 0-4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.