UdcaDenny Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 Me and P play 2 over 1 and P opened 1♥. I bid 2♦ and P bid splinter 3♠. As Im minimum for my bid I suggested 3NT with good hold in ♠ and astopper in ♣. Over my 3NT P bid 4♥ which I passed as we played matchpointsand I assumed he had 6 cards. My question is if I shud have bid 4♣ over 3♠as my P said but I thought he could have rebid ♠ to show firsthandcontrol or hecould have bid 4♦.[hv=pc=n&s=shakqj93dak53c982&n=saq2h42dqt872ca54&d=s&v=n&b=15&a=1hp2dp3sp3np4hppp]266|200[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 Your partner is passing the blame to you when he is at fault. What would a 3H bid over 2 diamonds show? Solid suit and fit? Even with 3spades, I would have rebid 4 spades over 3NT with his hand, or at least a forcing 4 diamonds. Don't beat your self up, I can't really fault you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 I'd be banned from this forum if I used the appropriate language to describe PD's bidding. How many tricks is his hand worth after you bid 2♦ GF? OK he's concerned about C ♣ perhaps but should realize that you have to have something there for 3NT after his splinter and should bid 4♦ which after your 3NT is very suggestive of slam. If PD is beating on you for not Qing 4♣ he should realize that you're showing a balanced min and you need to agree that his splinter shows major interest in slam even opposite a min. Then you can safely Q 4♣ and hopefully not have him go nuts with lots less for his splinter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 Hi, the auction was ok, but should continue over 4H.3NT over 3S, to show the spade stopper is obvious, but the 3NT does not show any club values at all. With 4H Opener showed a 64 hand, you have 2 Aces to cover 2 off his 3 outsideloosers.Given that, you could bid 5H, which would ask about suit quality in hearts. I am not sure, I would find the bid on the table, but ... well. With kind regardsMarlowe PS: 4D instead of 4H is certainly ok, I dont like 4S, because it commits you toan 11 trick game, and you may have 3 quick loosers in clubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 I'd be banned from this forum if I used the appropriate language to describe PD's bidding. How many tricks is his hand worth after you bid 2♦ GF? OK he's concerned about C ♣ perhaps but should realize that you have to have something there for 3NT after his splinter and should bid 4♦ which after your 3NT is very suggestive of slam.I don't think 3NT suggests anything in clubs at all, it suggests spade honnors. But 2♦ does, in the form that giving partner 12+ HCP is really tough without a club honnor. Not impossible but unlikely. As You and Ben said partner is too strong for 4♥ after 3NT. I think 4♣ over 3NT shows a club control with interest in 6♦, so 4♦ will make it clear to partner where our problem is. I prefer 4♦ over 4♠ for that reason. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wank Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 yes your partner should have bid 4d instead of signing off in 4h. your bidding was fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monikrazy Posted February 19, 2015 Report Share Posted February 19, 2015 Even though the auction is ok, it seems to me that 2H may be a more constructive bid for reaching slams/grands than an immediate splinter. Not sure if everyone would agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted February 20, 2015 Report Share Posted February 20, 2015 I don't understand what is waiting for bidding 4NT: when 2♦ is partner sure 12-13 points almost, South has to bid 3♥ to show its solid suit and also with 3NT must bid 4♦ refuseing NT having unbalanced hand and on prevision of 4NT (tendentally 6 keycards) void can be shown with 6♠ ...,bye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
all loomis Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 since the dq and c a will produce a slam, responder must not make a game bid. i like 4d over 3n- no c control. resp can sign off in 4h or 5d with no quick c winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mbodell Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Is 4♥ really an offer to play? I'd have thought it was a cue for diamonds, since for me 3♠ agreed diamonds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Is 4♥ really an offer to play? I'd have thought it was a cue for diamonds, since for me 3♠ agreed diamonds. I think it's a choice of games. Probably the pattern but maybe AQTxxx + AQxx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts