lycier Posted February 13, 2015 Report Share Posted February 13, 2015 [hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=SAKQT943HKQ4DA2C3&wn=机器人&w=SHJT63D86CAK97654&nn=机器人&n=S876H9752DQT75CT8&en=机器人&e=SJ52HA8DKJ943CQJ2&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=1S(Major%20suit%20opening%20--%205+%20%21S%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B)3C(Aggressive%20weak%20jump%20overcall%20--%207+%20%21C%3B%2011-%20HCP%3B%203+%20total%20points)PP4C(5+%20%21S%3B%2021%20HCP%3B%2022%20total%20points%3B%20forcing)P4S(2+%20%21S%3B%20forcing)PPP&p=]400|300[/hv] 4♠ says "2+♠,forcing". I think it is best to say "1+♠,forced",right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted February 13, 2015 Report Share Posted February 13, 2015 GIB explanations should never say "forced", even if the bid is. I don't think North would ever bid 4♠ with only 1S, except maybe if he was trap-passing with 1336 distribution; I'd expect him to bid a four-card red suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted February 13, 2015 Report Share Posted February 13, 2015 4♣ has not really meaningful explanation for GIB now and it causes issues with further explanations. Will be addressed for more appropriate meaning than just 5+ cards and super max hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.