Jump to content

Why Gib partner don't escape after my double


lycier

Recommended Posts

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=SAQHAQ953DAQ73C42&wn=机器人&w=S9752HT2D98CAQ875&nn=机器人&n=ST864H87DJ654CT93&en=机器人&e=SKJ3HKJ64DKT2CKJ6&d=n&v=o&b=&a=P1N(notrump%20opener.%20Could%20have%205M.%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)D(Penalty%20double%20--%2016+%20HCP)PPP&p=]400|300[/hv]

 

I am wondering why Gib partner don't escape.

If Gib N can escape and bid 2,I must bid 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it thinks it is strong enough that running isn't necessary. After all it can make 1nt-x on a lot of your leads.

 

Edit: Sorry I misread and thought you were asking why W doesn't escape. I agree North doesn't have clear escape, as you can double on a lot of hands with more solid suits and might have 1nt set in your own hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=SK42HQ6DAQ6CKQ973&wn=机器人&w=SAJ96HAJ2DKT872CA&nn=3ntmk&n=SQT83HKT73D54CJ85&en=机器人&e=S75H9854DJ93CT642&d=n&v=e&b=&a=PP1ND(Penalty%20double%20--%2016+%20HCP)PPP&p=SJSQS7S2C5C4CKCASAS3S5S4D8D4DJDQSKS6S8D9H6HAH3H9H2H7H5HQC3S9CJC6STH8D6D2HKH4C7HJHTCTC9DKD5D3DADTCQD7C8C2]400|300[/hv]

 

Here another example hand,it shows there are some defects in Gib system. I think this is a half-baked performance.

I sincerely hope to create a exit convention for Gib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=SK42HQ6DAQ6CKQ973&wn=机器人&w=SAJ96HAJ2DKT872CA&nn=3ntmk&n=SQT83HKT73D54CJ85&en=机器人&e=S75H9854DJ93CT642&d=n&v=e&b=&a=PP1ND(Penalty%20double%20--%2016+%20HCP)PPP&p=SJSQS7S2C5C4CKCASAS3S5S4D8D4DJDQSKS6S8D9H6HAH3H9H2H7H5HQC3S9CJC6STH8D6D2HKH4C7HJHTCTC9DKD5D3DADTCQD7C8C2]400|300[/hv]

 

Here another example hand,it shows there are some defects in Gib system. I think this is a half-baked performance.

I sincerely hope to create a exit convention for Gib.

 

The only player who should be considering running on this hand is East. Is that who you meant?

 

Incidentally I suggest that West's double is borderline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here another example hand,it shows there are some defects in Gib system. I think this is a half-baked performance.

I sincerely hope to create a exit convention for Gib.

 

I disagree. If you are doubling on a wide variety of shapes and strengths (maybe you have 20 not just 17), there's no way for weak partners of the doubler to really know if there is a safe landing spot. Doubler might have it beat opposite a flat yarb. And often on these type of hands it's just turning -180/380 into -200/-500.

 

After a redouble perhaps rescue systems make more sense.

 

If you play rescue systems then either East shows clubs, and West doesn't know if he has 6+ clubs and a stiff diamond or something where clubs is almost certainly better, or if East is running with flat hand and diamonds is better. Or East has some system where he shows clubs and higher, and you end up in hearts, down at least a couple and down 4 on best defense. Wouldn't you just rather take your -180?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...