1eyedjack Posted February 8, 2015 Report Share Posted February 8, 2015 [hv=sn=1eyedjack&s=SHAKJ973DK7CAQJ73&wn=Robot&w=SJ87H5DJ54CKT8642&nn=Robot&n=SQ96532HQT8642DC5&en=Robot&e=SAKT4HDAQT98632C9&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=1D(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20%21D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)2N(Unusual%20notrump%20overcall%20--%205+%20%21C%3B%203-%20%21D)P4D(10+%20total%20points)D(11-21%20HCP%3B%20rebiddable%20%21D%3B%20%21DKQ%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)6H(5+%20%21C%3B%203-%20%21D%3B%203-%20%21S%3B%20strong%20rebiddable%20%21)PPP&p=D4H2D3D7H4D2HAH5CAC6C5C9C3C2H6DT&c=13]400|300[/hv] Just an interesting freak hand, really, not a bug report. Any takers on how to get to 7H with confidence? I trust you agree it is where you want to be. First up, what do you think of my 2N overcall? In GIBberish it has no upper limit, and I felt that if it gets to 4S by the time I get another chance to bid I would rather be in the position of having shown 5-5. Next up, colour me stupid, but North does not have "10 total points" for the 4D bid. He only has 9, LOL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted February 8, 2015 Report Share Posted February 8, 2015 I certainly wouldn't try it, but it would be cool if: [hv=d=e&v=n&b=2&a=1d2np4ddppr]133|100[/hv]showed first-round control Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted February 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2015 I was thinking W....N.....E......S...............1D....2NP......5H....P?...5SP......6D....?......7H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted February 8, 2015 Report Share Posted February 8, 2015 As East, I think I'd bid 5♦ over 4♦ but pass over 5♥ in your second auction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted February 13, 2015 Report Share Posted February 13, 2015 Thanks for reporting it. Actually explanation was incomplete. GIB wished to show Splinter. 4♦ had to have the meaning which is fixed in next version -> 1- ♦; 3+ ♥; 9+ HCP; 10+ total points Obviously GIB added some "muscularity" based on shape and simming. But looks justified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted February 13, 2015 Report Share Posted February 13, 2015 It's perfectly reasonable to add "muscularity" to say that the given hand has 10+TP; it's not at all reasonable to imply that the given hand has 9+HCP. That HCP part of the explanation should be removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.