Jump to content

A Gib system defects


lycier

Recommended Posts

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=S752HA85DJ74C9854&wn=机器人&w=SHJ92DT9863CAK732&nn=机器人&n=SAKQJ9863HKQ6DA5C&en=机器人&e=ST4HT743DKQ2CQJT6&d=w&v=e&b=&a=P2C(Strong%20two%20club%20--%2019+%20HCP%3B%2023+%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20to%202N)P2D(2D%20bid%20waiting%20--%20forcing%20to%202N)P2S(Opener%27s%20suit%20--%205+%20%21S%3B%2019+%20HCP%3B%2023+%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20to%203S)P3S(3+%20%21S%3B%205+%20total%20points%3B%20forcing)P4S(5+%20%21S%3B%2019+%20HCP%3B%2023+%20total%20points)PPP&p=]400|300[/hv]

 

Sadly we lost slam in this regretable hand.

I am wondering why not explore slam after 3.I think there is no value on the explanations of rebid-4 .Gib also don't play exclusion RKCB.

These are Gib system defects actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For another example:

 

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=S753HT4D75CKJT765&wn=机器人&w=SAQJ982HK9DAT6C93&nn=机器人&n=S4HQ3DQJ9842CA842&en=机器人&e=SKT6HAJ87652DK3CQ&d=w&v=o&b=&a=1S(Major%20suit%20opening%20--%205+%20%21S%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)P2H(Forcing%20two%20over%20one%20--%205+%20%21H%3B%2012+%20HCP%3B%2013+%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20to%203N)P2S(Opener%20rebids%20suit%20--%203-%20%21H%3B%205+%20%21S%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20to%203N)P3S(Support%3B%20possibly%20a%20strong%20hand%20--%205+%20%21H%3B%203+%20%21S%3B%2012+%20HCP%3B%2013+%20total%20points%3B%20forcing)P4S(3-%20%21H%3B%205+%20%21S%3B%2011+%20HCP%3B%2012-17%20total%20points)PPP&p=]400|300[/hv]

 

After 3,Gib W don't explore slam with extra values,and there is no value on the explanations of 4 in the same way.

After 3,rebid-4 denied some controls in minors?showed 11-13hcp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the first ,honestly, i am agree with you: there is a void in club that GIB (i think) considers, then however doesn't bid RKCB ? For the second post again there is a longness in spade and there cards in hearts, but now we have a 5-4-2-2 and with only an Ace two losers can be not covered (then Gib could be justified). I suggest, if you were on declaration, to procede with RKCB lacking(=with necessary attemption) Aces too that probably has your GIB partner can stop,eventually in negative case,bidding at five level (i have personally experimented this one), bye.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I believe is that GIB is evaluating its hand as a minimum 2C opener, despite the playing strength. A 4D cue is certainly correct, followed of course by S showing the HA. Now N can bid 5C hoping for a cue of the DK. Or just jump to 6S if that is too much to ask.

 

Gee, another time a 4D cue is right to show the A, below game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added term for discussion if EKCB is possible to be applied for next version (v33) in terms of when to be used and constraints for it. Of course replies will be the easiest part.

 

Maybe at least for some clear auctions like:

 

1M - 2x

3x - 5z

 

1M - 2x

2M - 5z

 

1M - 2x

2y/M - 3M

4(if 1 opening)/5z

 

2 - 2

2M - 3M

4(if M=)/5z

 

But will add more information when scenario is more clear about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...