lycier Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 [hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=ST8764H82D3CAT985&wn=机器人&w=SJ3HAK43DAQ9862C2&nn=3ntmk&n=SA2HT765DKJ75CKQ7&en=机器人&e=SKQ95HQJ9DT4CJ643&d=n&v=b&b=&a=1DP1S2D(twice%20rebiddable%20%21D%3B%2012+%20total%20points)PP3CD(Takeout%20double%20--%205-%20%21C%3B%204+%20%21H%3B%205-%20%21S%3B%20twice%20rebiddable%20%21D%3B%2016+%20total%20points)P4C(9-%20total%20points)PPDPP4H(5-%20%21C%3B%205+%20%21H%3B%205-%20%21S%3B%20twice%20rebiddable%20%21D%3B%2016-25%20total%20points)DPPP&p=]400|300[/hv] 1- What's the meanings of 4♣? Is the purpose of 4♣ to tell prtner tht it have 9-TPS instead of suit? And pass after double.2- 4♥ says"5+♥",it is also wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iandayre Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iandayre Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 A bug, agreed. 4C is a terrible bid of course, but I suspect GIB is backed into it by the poor explanations of other calls. Ironically, 3H is the obvious action but HERE, when partner demanded a bid, it refuses to bid a 3 card suit.Edit - perhaps 3H isn't THAT obvious. 3D isn't awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 Edit - perhaps 3H isn't THAT obvious.You forget that for GIB a 3 card suit is biddable, even without partner implying length in it :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted February 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Obviously,the explanations of 4♣ or 4♣ bid have no meaning to this hand,so I think it is a bug. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.