Jump to content

Suggestion on improving the compatibility and skill


lycier

Recommended Posts

Suggestion on improving the compatibility and skill

 

Many of BBOers often complain of hard to find good players whom play with/against.

Many of BBOers often complain of hypocrisy of self rating.

I think the bboskill conclusion may be fair in the bbo skill website, if the total hands is set up over 10,000.

I suggest that BBO can add a option of the bbo skill,its prerequisites at below.

1-The total hands is set up over 100,000.

2-The BBOer play over five years.

For example,if this is feasible.then bbo can set up a special public club-the bboers only with over 1800 scores can open table or play at there.Orelse,I think more and more bboers will prefer to watch rather than play at the table,and gradually lose interest in bbo bridge.

Don't forget BBO is 10 years old,it is time to take chance to handle these problems.

Best Wishes

 

lycier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest that BBO can add a option of the bbo skill,its prerequisites at below.[/font]

1-The total hands is set up over 100,000.

2-The BBOer play over five years.

Are you suggesting that no one would have this rating until he has been a BBO member for at least 5 years and has played at least 100,000 hands on BBO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you suggesting that no one would have this rating until he has been a BBO member for at least 5 years and has played at least 100,000 hands on BBO?

 

I am suggesting that no one would have this New rating until he has been a BBO member for at least 5 years and has played at least 100,000 hands on BBO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't currently record the number of hands everyone has played, although we could get it from our archives. Only 60% of users have been members for at least 5 years. A method that excludes almost half the membership seems flawed.

 

Note that bboskill has no official connection with BBO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't currently record the number of hands everyone has played, although we could get it from our archives. Only 60% of users have been members for at least 5 years. A method that excludes almost half the membership seems flawed.

100,000 is beyond ridiculous. I'd expect that less than a quarter of that 60% have played that many. I just reached 5 years, and I probably don't have half that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...