Jump to content

Rebid by responder


Bbradley62

Recommended Posts

What would 2 have shown over 2?

[hv=nn=GIB%20N&n=SAT963HKQ64DJ65C4&d=e&v=o&b=14&a=P1C(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20%21C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B)P1S(One%20over%20one%20--%204+%20%21S%3B%206+%20total%20points)P2D(Opener%20reverse%20--%205+%20%21C%3B%204+%20%21D%3B%203-%20%21S%3B%202)P2S(5+%20%21S%3B%207+%20HCP%3B%20forcing%20to%203N)]270|270[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure you can guess - it would be 4th suit forcing to game. Not ideal of course. There are ways around this but I will have to refer to some old notes for more details.

 

The other issue is that if there is no non-game forcing way to bid Hearts, then 2NT would probably be a better bid than 2S. As would 2D. This is reminiscent of the recent discussion with Georgi about inverted minors. GIB is too obsessed with point count and not sufficiently concerned about reaching the right strain. And also another example of the programmers' frequently allowing GIB to make bids with insufficient suit length or strength for that level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed the fact that it was a reverse. We know that 2S is forcing, but yes, excellent question, what would 2H have meant, it seems like a normal action for this hand. Some play 4th suit at the 2 level over a reverse as the negative with 2NT natural, but I don't think GIB does.

 

I'll try to remember to look at 2H the next time this auction comes up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...