Jump to content

Taking advantage of an OLOOT


antonylee

  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you do with righty's OLOOT?

    • Accept the lead and declare
      9
    • Accept the lead and let partner declare
      3
    • Refuse the lead and make the H3 a penalty card
      10
    • Refuse the lead and force a heart lead
      0
    • Refuse the lead and prohibit a heart lead
      3


Recommended Posts

Normally I'd say accept the lead and declare using the old saying that if the opponent didn't know who's turn it was to lead they probably didn't know what to lead. But here if I can paint in the opponents mind that I have heart weakness (even though I think this is probably UI) and if I can get my LHO to lead a spade up to my honors, I think that is probably good for my side.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course choices 4 and 5 are simply subsets of choice 3 so including both is a little pointless.

No, if you choose to force or forbid a heart lead by lefty, the H3 is picked up and is no longer a penalty card (although UI still applies). It stays a penalty card only if you choose to let lefty free to lead whatever he wants -- in which case the three options (force a heart, forbid a heart, keep the H3 a penalty card) applies as long as he stays on lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of making it a penalty card and giving lefty open slather.

 

Unless he has solid diamonds to cash, righty will win and be forced to lead the heart thus regaining the tempo if I have to lose a club trick to them before setting up partners long suit (assuming 3c showed 5+) unless they lead a heart at trick 1 in which case I have some chance to 'hide' one of my honours so it looks like I was hoping for a free trick in some way. And you never know they could lead a spade for me and give up an extra trick.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Option 3 seems best imo. This gives us options in consequent play, for example to make opps lead if West would decide to start with s and that turns out badly.

Indeed, I didn't notice that I could prevent them from knocking out my stopper if necessary.

At the table I simply thought "it's so likely that this gives away a trick to partner's Jx" that I accepted the lead, and, for good measure, let partner play it.

He held Ax xxx AQx KT7xx but both pointed finesses offside and clubs 5-1 meant -1, when I would have made on the normal lead of a small spade from Qxxxx Jxx Jxxx x :(

EDIT: One too many hearts :)

Edited by antonylee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand partner's 3!C bid at all. Why did he want to emphasise a KTxxx suit?

I chose to declarer, because I didn't want the xxxx in diamonds to appear in dummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand partner's 3!C bid at all. Why did he want to emphasise a KTxxx suit?

I chose to declarer, because I didn't want the xxxx in diamonds to appear in dummy.

What's your rebid otherwise? I guess it's more a systems question, as I'd expect 2M to show 4 and 2N to promise stoppers.

Obviously you may not like a system where 2D is a catchall (well, I don't know your favorite methods) but you'd have even less room on any other rebid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...