lycier Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 [hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=机器人&s=SQ8HKQ87DQJ43C932&wn=lycier&w=S432H965D92CAQT86&nn=机器人&n=SKJT75HAJ3DAK6C75&en=机器人&e=SA96HT42DT875CKJ4&d=w&v=b&b=20&a=P1N(notrump%20opener.%20Could%20have%205M.%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P2C(Stayman%20--)D(11-%20HCP%3B%20rebiddable%20%21C%3B%2012-%20total%20points)2S(2-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-3%20%21H%3B%204-5%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P3N(4%20%21H%3B%203-%20%21S%3B%2010-15%20HCP)PPP&p=CJC9C6C7CKC2CAC5CQS7C4C3CTS5D8D3C8D6S6H7S2SJSAS8S9SQS3STD4D2DADTH3H2HKH5H8H9HJHTDKD7DJD9SKD5DQS4HAH4HQH6]499|350[/hv] 温故而知新。当斯台曼被加倍后,如何取得最佳的4M定约,如何设计呢? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shisun Posted January 8, 2015 Report Share Posted January 8, 2015 我们用的体系中用Kansas约定首先应叫人10点,应该要成局的。 [hv=pc=n&s=sq8hkq87dqj43c932&w=s432h965d92caqt86&n=skjt75haj3dak6c75&e=sa96ht42dt875ckj4&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=p1np2cd]399|300[/hv] ?XX c有双止p 无c止2d 有c止,无高直接花色回答 有止并花色套 [hv=pc=n&s=sq8hkq87dqj43c932&w=s432h965d92caqt86&n=skjt75haj3dak6c75&e=sa96ht42dt875ckj4&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=p1np2cdpp]399|300[/hv]?XX 要求开叫人继续正常回答叫出花色是套逼局,暗含c止好像要求过高了! [hv=pc=n&s=sq8hkq87dqj43c932&w=s432h965d92caqt86&n=skjt75haj3dak6c75&e=sa96ht42dt875ckj4&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=p1np2cdpp2hp3hp4hppp]399|300[/hv] 这里2h照规定是要求有c止的,我觉得要求过高了!因为2h是逼局的。3h叫的目的是,告诉对方h配合,c无止,你自己确认打什么定约。 如何显示5张套?这牌h3张中有大牌,所以能打,如果点在s怎么办? 会不会漏了5-3配合?有不错的s 套,是否能开1s?我们有巴特后续! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green123 Posted January 23, 2015 Report Share Posted January 23, 2015 学习了!有用! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dillon561 Posted January 24, 2015 Report Share Posted January 24, 2015 [hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=机器人&s=SQ8HKQ87DQJ43C932&wn=lycier&w=S432H965D92CAQT86&nn=机器人&n=SKJT75HAJ3DAK6C75&en=机器人&e=SA96HT42DT875CKJ4&d=w&v=b&b=20&a=P1N(notrump%20opener.%20Could%20have%205M.%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P2C(Stayman%20--)D(11-%20HCP%3B%20rebiddable%20%21C%3B%2012-%20total%20points)2S(2-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-3%20%21H%3B%204-5%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P3N(4%20%21H%3B%203-%20%21S%3B%2010-15%20HCP)PPP&p=CJC9C6C7CKC2CAC5CQS7C4C3CTS5D8D3C8D6S6H7S2SJSAS8S9SQS3STD4D2DADTH3H2HKH5H8H9HJHTDKD7DJD9SKD5DQS4HAH4HQH6]499|350[/hv] 温故而知新。当斯台曼被加倍后,如何取得最佳的4M定约,如何设计呢?这又是5张高花开NT的烦恼,若就目前进程,2♣加倍已经给了警告,2♠不是承诺有♣止的话,就得探明到底谁有♣止。我设计如下,看是否恰当:1NT-P-2♣-DBL-2♠-P-3♦(开叫家否定了有4张♥,因此先叫出♦套,未叫2NT,也表示无♣止)-P-3♥(有3张好♥支持)-P-3♠(有两张带一大的♠,让开叫家选择,这里,若2♠不排除是有5张♠开的NT)。双方该描述的已经描述完毕,后面开叫家就是主叫人选择定约了。但若开叫1♠,无争叫的话,进程就会简单一些。1♠-P-1NT(逼叫)-P-2♦-P-3♦-P-3♥(这里不会误会是有4张♥,否则该再叫2♥,只是表示担心♣,试探是否该打3NT),南家做出52配合高花打4♠的可能就大些了。楼主看这样的设计是否合理? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.