Jump to content

Assign the subjunctive blame - who was the (bigger) wuss?


  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. Blame away (conditional on 2/1)

    • S should have rebid 3S
    • N should have rebid 2N
    • Just Bad luck to have (cough) been playing an awkward system
    • Other (please specify)
    • N should have rebid 3S


Recommended Posts

IMPs. My BBO random expert partner was helpful enough to criticise me for not having rebid 3. Given that we were playing 2/1*, I wasn't sure who should have acted more aggressively.

 

[hv=pc=n&s=sak9832hakd987cj9&n=sq4h954da6532ca84&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1sp1np2sppp]266|200[/hv]

 

* Well, we must have been, despite his profile saying 'SAYC' and mine saying 'your card'. You can tell from the bidding, and his expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

* Well, we must have been, despite his profile saying 'SAYC' and mine saying 'your card'. You can tell from the bidding, and his expertise.

I would't assume anything with a random partner unless discussed, much like the field for skill level is not very useful,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

North could be playing SAYC* .....

 

According to the book Standard Bidding with SAYC by Ned Downey and Ellen Pomer (Caitlin),(page 33), responding to a Major:

 

- Minimum range 6-9/10HCP and littler interest in game unless partner is very strong.

 

I don't think your hand counts as very strong.

 

However that's a very poorly evaluated hand and if playing SAYC I would bid 2D.

 

If it is 2/1 then passing 2S is another poor evaluation.

 

Playing 2/1 I might be tempted to bid 3S with South cards and Vul if I know partner is conservative and doesn't just automatically accept invites, but expect to be in a tough game if partner raises.

 

*In my experience in MBC very few people who have SAYC in their profile are even aware it is a full system and just think it means 5-card majors and strong 1NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question for responder is not "PASS, 2NT or 3S?" It is "3S or 4S?" and anything else is not even close.

 

Here are some (sub) minimum hands for opener where 4S is cold or at least highly probable:

 

AKxxxx, x, xx, Kxxx (lose 1 trick in each suit other than trump) or JT9xx, Ax, KQxx, Qx (lose 2 trump and either a H or a C but not both). It is absolutely golden to have your Aces outside partner's suit and your fill card (QS) in her suit. There is no better 10 count that lacks a third trump or void.

 

I am not saying I voted 4S, I didn't. But 4S is better than PASS which is barely worse than 2NT.

 

Responder cannot bid 3D as that would show 6 diamonds and a near bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sak9832hakd987cj9&n=sq4h954da6532ca84&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1sp1np2sppp]266|200|

IMPs. My BBO random expert partner was helpful enough to criticise me for not having rebid 3. Given that we were playing 2/1*, I wasn't sure who should have acted more aggressively.

* Well, we must have been, despite his profile saying 'SAYC' and mine saying 'your card'. You can tell from the bidding, and his expertise.[/hv]

IMO

After 1 - 1N - ??: 2 = 10, 3 = 9, 2N = 8, 2 (Gazzilli) = 11 :)

After 1 - 1N - 2 - ??: 3 = 10, 2N = 9, Pass = 7.

2s bid totally normal. Passing with 2 aces and qx of spades totally abnormal
IMO a 3 rebid is a reasonable shot if partner would pass 1 on poor hands.
Sometimes you can be max for your 2S bid. Nth should bid 3S. Bidding 2NT is horrible.
IMO, Jinksy's 2N might work better when opener is weaker.

A K x x x x Q x x J x Q x when 3 is in jeopardy.

A K x x x x A J x J x J x when 3N is safer than 4.

 

After 1 - 1N - 2 - 3 - ?? Should South consider 3N as well as 4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've seen this honour structure for North in two previous threads. I was a lone voice for jumping to 3NT as I recall, then someone dug up an almost identical hand where Fred did the same.

 

I would suggest that a jump to 3NT should show this hand type - two aces plus a spade honour. The point is you have 9 tricks opposite AKxxxx plus the heart ace or a min suit king.

 

It's slightly easier if you play constructive twos in a major, so 1M then 2M is known to be pretty sound. As an aside, I think 2NT over 2 should be forcing - if we are not playing in game, it is usually right to prefer 3 to 2NT, and the forcing treatment allows us to explore strain more efficiently.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By definition, blame always goes to the opening poster http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif

 

In my book opener's rebid is 3, while responder's rebid to 2 is obviously 3 (or 3NT if you feel frisky lol).

 

Both get 100% :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether N bids 1NT or 2D does not alter that S has the count and shape for 3S.

 

So I give S 100% on the "first error rules" philosophy.

 

Having said that, I would bid 3S over 2S with the N cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KNR has it as a 17 count, but DK points has it at 15? The AK of spades is great, but his other HCP are in short suits. Hand doesn't feel like it is worth significantly more or less than the 15 HCP evaluation imho. I play Gaz, so 1S-1NT-3S is 15-16, and I'd try that here, but playing standard methods this does not feel like a tasty 16+ that I need to bid 3S here.

 

I mean, if this is 3S, what does partner need to raise a 2S to 3S after a NF 1NT being corrected to 2S?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

N should bid 3s over 2s (even thinking about anything else

(especially strain) is bad to worse). Everyone has their favorite

"rules" of how to accept a game invite after 1M 1N 3M. Mine happens

to be 2 aces or greater than 8. Note that the south hand is not

strong enough to invite with 3M since 2 aces does not yield game.

 

N should realize their 2 aces + working trump Q is more than

strong enough to invite game since opener did not bid 3M where

only 2 aces would be enough for game.

 

I realize that the pass of 2s can easily be written off to the

steady dilution of opening bid value but this is IMPS not MP so missing

a vul game because one is too afraid of going down just makes no

economical sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 1 - 1N - 2 - ??: 3 = 10, 2N = 9, Pass = 7.

 

I think you need to rank 4S as better than Pass. 2 outside Aces and a filling Q are nearly if not fully an opening bid.

 

After 1 - 1N - 2 - 3 - ?? Should South consider 3N as well as 4?

 

Depends on how much you trust partner . . . pretty damn sure that 2S shows 6, but if there is any chance that partner will read it as 5, then no. And anyway, you have two unbid suits unstopped plus you have "tight" honors in the H suit, so no don't try 3NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1sp-1nt-2cl (showing Ds). 1sp-1nt-2nt,(invitational with clubs). 1 sp-1nt-3cl (forcing with clubs)- 5-2-2-4 and 15-16, open 1 NT

 

This system can be used with precision as well, and you can fine tune it even more...

 

1 sp-1nt-

3H (showing single clubs).

1 sp-1nt-

2D-2H-

3H (swowing single D) This last one works perfect with strong club system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...