Jump to content

Yet Another Pre-Empt From Opps


Recommended Posts

OK, I have dug up a few similar hands from the database, so try this quiz. On each hand the bidding starts 2-pass-4:

 

1. Game All. KQJ95 A T3 J9643

 

2. Vul v non vul. QT862 A6 3 AQ872

 

3. Non vul v vul. KQ876 96 6 AQ832

 

4. Vul v non vul. 2 = Fantunes. KT743 J QT AQJ84

 

So, do you feel lucky?

 

Sorry, I never gave the answers.

 

1. A fiasco. The 2 opener forgets to double 4 with: 87632KQT98KT5. But that's OK, because our partner doubles 5 for no particular reason on T4Q98764A87. -850.

 

2. 4 bid and made - they are not cheap in 5.

 

3. You escape for -100 in 4X on soft defence. 4 is cold.

 

4. You get whacked for -200, but again 4 is cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not that aggressive for all 6-5 hands in same situation, as you can see in another thread by Diana, I passed J KJxxx KT876 x love all, when LHO opened 4 and it came to me.

I agree with you that passing on the East hand given by eagles is losing bridge. I would bid 4NT on the hand you give here if 5-6 but not if 6-5, assuming the missing card is a small one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I didn't reply, but agree with the bidders.

 

A couple factors should push you to bid. First, the opponents have a fit, so chances are high that you have a fit also. Second, you have a very distributional hand. Shapely hands tend to play well if you can find a fit.

 

Qxxxx isn't ideal to bid on, but you don't want to miss 4 if it's a make.

 

 

Side Story - Last half of regional KO 2nd bracket final, behind by 31 at the half. NV vs. Vul, LHO bids 1 , partner passes, RHO bids 4 and I hold -- - xx AJxxx A108xxx. I had no problem bidding 4 NT (2 places to play). LHO bid 5 . Partner bid 6 which was doubled and passed out. RHO unfortunately decided to lead the A. Partner held the Kxx, a stiff , and KQJx. He pitched a on the K, ruffed out the to set them up, and made 6 for +1090. Had RHO found a lead, we would have been off 1 in 6 doubled. Once I bid 4 NT, the opponents were destined to be down at least a Vul game swing minimum if they didn't find a similar bid at the other table. If the opponents had bid on to 6 , a lead by partner and easy return beats 6 . One of the reasons I made the bid had been a similar experience a couple years previous holding a 6-5 hand VUL where I didn't bid. The corresponding opponent found a 4 NT call, the sac was right and it cost us a VUL game swing. So, I lived and learned not to be timid with distributional hands. (BTW, we won the final by 39.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...