diana_eva Posted December 13, 2014 Report Share Posted December 13, 2014 Please apply here if you'd like to play vs JEC/Garozzo on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted December 14, 2014 Report Share Posted December 14, 2014 Kristen33 & jillybean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suokko Posted December 15, 2014 Report Share Posted December 15, 2014 suokko & Derric I know I haven't posted too much in a while. But I'm still lurking. We have a new biding system that will be 16 days old on Saturday. You might get a chance to laugh when bid some funny contracts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diana_eva Posted December 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2014 Great, so we have a full team :) Kristen33 & jillybeansuokko & Derric Good luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted December 16, 2014 Report Share Posted December 16, 2014 Hallo, yesterday was kib when sillafu played 6NT with pisoy (Team susi) : how can i do to see again this hand? Thanks and bye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 Hallo, yesterday was kib when sillafu played 6NT with pisoy (Team susi) : how can i do to see again this hand? Thanks and bye.http://webutil.bridgebase.com/v2/tview.php?t=9261-1418670208&u=sillafu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 Thanks, yes was board 12: when there i asked "why not 2 clubs opening bidding ?" Fourthemore there are 7 diamonds and how i thinked a squeeze ♠ - ♥ simple (twin entry recessed) against South or a simple-as-double too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suokko Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 We lost 47-121. Some mistakes and they played very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 I don't know if it can be considered a mistake and as far as possible to think by me it but, as i have said, i was interested to analyzer the hand because the play was ended and i had only seen that were 7 easy diamonds to play(but difficultose to bid using Reese yet) and if a second suit plus heart was controlled from an opp and if there were conditions for a squeeze (infact there are others two possibilities) in NT contract, bye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suokko Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 I don't know if it can be considered a mistake and as far as possible to think by me it but, as i have said, i was interested to analyzer the hand because the play was ended and i had only seen that were 7 easy diamonds to play(but difficultose to bid using Reese yet) and if a second suit plus heart was controlled from an opp and if there were conditions for a squeeze (infact there are others two possibilities) in NT contract, bye. Squeeze was superior play for over trick instead of the finesse. Because it works with either 4♥+4♠ in same hand or 4♠+♣K in same hand. That is better odds than simple finesse where 4♥ at south makes finesse less than 50%. But seven is very hard to bid without fit because it requires that combined very good diamond holding to be a good contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Squeeze was superior play for over trick instead of the finesse. Because it works with either 4♥+4♠ in same hand or 4♠+♣K in same hand. That is better odds than simple finesse where 4♥ at south makes finesse less than 50%. But seven is very hard to bid without fit because it requires that combined very good diamond holding to be a good contract.But squeeze doesn't work if spades are divided from hearts and clubs. About bidding Reese convention require a compact suit like here diamonds needing only three cards on support (here Qx) asking contemporrally for Ace but probably does not convenue between them and also most players prefer rever than to bid 2♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.