pclayton Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 Critique these bidding sequences. They were the 1st two hands I played today on BBO: Hand #1 - EW Vul, IMPs [hv=w=saxxxhkxxdkxxcxxx&e=sxhaqjtxxdxcakxxx]266|100|[/hv] Auction: South.....West.....North.....East1♠....Pass....Pass....4♥Pass....4♠....Pass....5♣Pass....5♦....Pass....6♥ Result: -1 Hand #2: All Vul, IMPs [hv=w=saxxxhkxxdkxxcxxx&e=sxhaqjtxxdxcakxxx]266|100|[/hv] Auction: South.....West.....North.....East.................................1♠Pass....1N......Pass....3♣Dbl ....3♠..Pass....4♠Pass....4N......Pass....5♦Pass....7♠..All pass Result: -2 (North had ♦Jxxxx) Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbreath Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 HiBoth of these hands have the same basic problem.. lack of fit for p's second suit.In the first hand xxx is worst possible holding, in the 2nd the singlton would be a much better feature if you held a 4th spade.Overbidding due to poor hand evaluation leading to bad result...also agree with Ben about 3c rebid on hand 2 .. it's too pushy with weak suits.Rgds Dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbleighton Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 1) Looks fine to me.2) Agree with Ben that 3C was too much. If you don't play his methods, then it's tough after 1S-1N-2C-3S. If you play the first cue bid is first round controls, as you know pd won't have an ace, and probabaly doesn't have a void. Check for the SK, and go if he's got it. This may be double-dummy bidding. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 1)...think the balance should be michaels. hard hand though, may still get to slam. 2) this one i have no sympathy. 3C is really bad, but the 7S bid was just atrocious. What 13 tricks were counted on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 Hmm, am I the only one who would pass with West in the first hand after 4♥? Arend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcphee Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 I agree with justin that the balancing hand should bid 2S for the first hand. 4H was a poor choice and gives up on a possible slam. Why the other hand bid over 4H is a mystery to me. The second hand the j/s is poor and just not what a j/s shows for me. How the other hand can take over with key card with that H holding is no mystery, it's hopeless! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 1) 4h or michaels. Will pass over 4h not cue.2) If we assume the wimpy 1nt reply and 2c rebid:I would bid 4s not 3s. Thought 3s is only a strong invite on this bidding? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 On board #1, I would bid 2S (michaels). But 4H was OK, too. The bad bid, imo, is 5♦. 3 small cards in ♣ was not good, and ♦K wouldn't help much. On board #2, West's hand was borderline, 1N/2D or even 4C (lack of 4th trump). 3C was certainly a bad bid. I would rebid 2C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted March 2, 2005 Report Share Posted March 2, 2005 1st hand pass 4H. Pard is already counting on you to have something. You don't have enough extras to try for 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.