SimonFa Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 My judgement when it comes to making doubles is terrible. I thought about it on this hand but decided against because of the points distribution. I didn't bid on because it was GIB and partner would have expected a lot more and, as others found out, you end up way too high. Results suggest it was a doubling hand but opinion was split amongst those who didn't bid on. MPs, W v W. ♠KT654 ♥K ♦KQ ♣QT582 P (P) 1S (2H)P (P) ? 75% wasn't a bad result, just wondering if I missed an obvious double. As always, thanks in advance, Simon PS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Nothing wrong with passing that, I think. You're min, and pard passed a very shape-descriptive opening, so odds your side has nothing. Sure, dbl can be right, but it can also lead to a heck of a lot of trouble if pard pulls to 3♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Nothing wrong with passing that, I think. You're min, and pard passed a very shape-descriptive opening, so odds your side has nothing. Sure, dbl can be right, but it can also lead to a heck of a lot of trouble if pard pulls to 3♦.All the other stuff you say seems about right. But I don't understand, "You're min, and pard passed a very shape-descriptive opening". In what way have I described 5-1-2-5? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 What I mean is that 1♠ is considerably more descriptive in what concerns shape than e.g. 1m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts