Antrax Posted November 7, 2014 Report Share Posted November 7, 2014 [hv=pc=n&s=sa53h2dkt97542ca6&w=st842hkt7d63ck954&n=sqj6hq5daqj8cqj72&e=sk97haj98643dct83&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1n2c(Capp%2C%20single%20suited)3c(!D%20transfer)p3dp3h(Splinter.%20GF%2C%201-!H)p3n(Yeah%20Qx%20is%20great%20opposite%20that)ppp]399|300[/hv]Basic GIBs. N decides to eschew playing 5♦ with his ♥Qx opposite a shortness, "knowing" that hearts are bound not to break as E advertised length in something.The play is also a thing of beauty. E leads the ♣3, which GIB ducks to the K, because why cash your nine winners, amirite?W switches to the ♥7, N plays the Q and E wins the A and continues clubs. Don't know if this is worse than regular basic GIB, it seemed pretty bad to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted November 7, 2014 Report Share Posted November 7, 2014 You probably confused GIB by not taking your 9 top tricks :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antrax Posted November 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2014 Not sure if you were serious - GIB N declared the hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted November 8, 2014 Report Share Posted November 8, 2014 I think John meant that declarer (human or not) confused East-GIB by not taking 9 off the top, so East thought he shouldn't lead away from ♥J9xxxx around to declarer's ♥KTx at Trick 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antrax Posted November 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2014 Interesting. I'd assumed GIB can't confuse itself regardless of the seat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.