el mister Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Playing 2/1, we have the following inv minor auction: [hv=pc=n&s=s98ht85dqjt987ck9&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1dp3ddp3hp3sdp]133|200[/hv] Do we have a decision to make here, ie there is an element of consultation to pard's double? Or is he laying down the law? What action do you recommend? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahydra Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 I think this is fine to pass. Maybe if we were much weaker and shapelier it would be correct to pull because it hardly sounds like partner can have enough defence (given absence of XX or another call on the previous round), but here we have got full value for what we promised and a side defensive card. ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Partner did not invite your further participation in this auction. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 We preempted -> partner's double is penalty. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billw55 Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 The time to countermand partner's decision is when we hold something unexpected. No such thing here, clear pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Would certainly leave it if pard had redoubled, showing extras. As it is, I'm weary he has ye olde 12-14 balanced... Bottom line is: leave it in if I don't know pard, pull if I trust him (in which case dbl is just a suggestion to penalize). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Unless p has forgotton about inverted minors, he doesn't have a balanced 12-14. OK, AQJ7-Axxx-xxx-QJ maybe. But that's OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 1) how big is 3m? 0-6, 6-9, 4-7? Makes a difference in the "what we've shown v. what we have" discussion. 2) joining the chorus, though. I promised lots of diamonds and not much outside - and no other place to play. I have lots of diamonds and more than partner deserves outside, and no other place to play. "No questions, partner" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Our range for 3d is quite wide and we are about middle for what p might expectfor our 3d bid. Even if p xx my hand might be so weak that pulling would be a good idea (x xxx Kxxxxxx xx). That means that if we have an average hand for our bidand p had xx we would leave it in. This hand qualifies as average for 3d and since p failed to xx the x of 3s falls into the nature of cooperative and we should run to 4d. The range of 3d preemptive is mostly 5 to about 9 but with a bit more distributioncan run as low as 3 (see example hand above) and I am sure it could be lower with morediamonds though we might want to consider 4d and 5d with those holdings depending on vulnerability. Unfavorable you hold x xx xxxxxxxxx x and the bidding goes 1d p it mightstill be a good idea to bid 3d whereas at favorable its an easy 5d bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el mister Posted October 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Thanks all - seems fairly clear. I did think about lifting it at the table - inv minor raise is 6-9 and 5+ for us, so I felt 6 very solid diamonds with v little outside might call for a retreat into 4. Passed, though, and 3♠x made as opps have a submerged 10 card club fit. So the result got me thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Unless p has forgotton about inverted minors, he doesn't have a balanced 12-14. OK, AQJ7-Axxx-xxx-QJ maybe. But that's OK.Yes, the nine-card club fit should be a given, from responder's standpoint. Opener will not be doubling 3S unless 4-4-3-2 with a spade stack. There is no hand with 4 Diamonds which couldn't/wouldn't bid or redouble over 3DX with extras, so he must have something like your example. It seems, that the OP's partner didn't agree with us...perhaps until now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manastorm Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 I am not sure what to think, but I would assume that partner is very serious about 3♠ not making. We pre-empted, the ops are trying to find their fit and the right level, it doesnt look like a spot to make a tight double. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 I am not sure what to think, but I would assume that partner is very serious about 3♠ not making. We pre-empted, the ops are trying to find their fit and the right level, it doesnt look like a spot to make a tight double.I am not sure what to think, either. But I think you should keep posting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggwhiz Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 So the result got me thinking. You might give some thought to what your 3♦ bid shows. In my partnership this one is at least a King heavy(that's what single raises are for). Any agreement is workable but in the context of your, your partner had a serious disconnect. And BTW, what does a single raise show playing your range? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdegrande Posted October 23, 2014 Report Share Posted October 23, 2014 Pass. You have better defense than partner might expect from this auction, and your diamond length won't be a surprise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted October 23, 2014 Report Share Posted October 23, 2014 Clear pass for this hand. If partner has any doubt that 3♠X is making they should pass or bid 4♦ themselves. Have to be sure of tricks cause this is likely a distributional hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourdad Posted October 24, 2014 Report Share Posted October 24, 2014 If you pull it a bad hand is your fault. If you leave it pard's fault! LEAVE IT!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts