Bbradley62 Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 [hv=sn=human&s=SK74HAKQ83DK42CQ2&wn=Robot&w=S632HTDQT9875CJT5&nn=Robot&n=SJT985HJ76542DCA3&en=Robot&e=SAQH9DAJ63CK98764&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=1N(notrump%20opener.%20Could%20have%205M.%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P2C(Stayman%20--)P2H(2-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%204-5%20%21H%3B%202-4%20%21S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P3H(Invite%20--%204+%20%21H%3B%209%20total%20points)P4H(2-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%204-5%20%21H%3B%202-4%20%21S%3B%2017%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)PPD(Takeout%20double%20--%203+%20%21C%3B%203+%20%21D%3B%202-%20%21H%3B%203+%20%21S%3B%2018-20%20total%20points)PPP&p=CJCAC9C2H2H9HAHTD2D5H4D6SJSAS4S2CKCQC5C3SQSKS6S5D4D7H5D3S8C6S7S3S9C7H3DTH8D8HJC8STC4DKD9H6DJHQCTHKDQH7DA]360|270[/hv]5 of 9 human Souths opened 1N. 2 of them redoubled and were allowed to play there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 100% West. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 tough one. Hard not to breach a total of 100%. It would not occur to me just to bid 3H with North.It would not occur to me to double with East, but perhaps it should.But West takes the biscuit. Prob. end in 5HX over 5D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 i think more than 100% to go round. I think east GIB has a lot to blame. Why is Gib coming in so late? surely its better to come in 1st round doubling 2♣ or bidding 3♣.East Gib was essentially forcing West Gib to bid at the 5-level easily could be 800. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iandayre Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 E has a tricky hand, hard to say what it should actually do. Perhaps just double Stayman and then subside. This is a problem above GIB's pay grade. From W point of view NS could be on a 44 fit, and N showed only an invitation. I'd be tempted to treat the double as penalty as W did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 I'd be tempted to treat the double as penalty as W did. GIB describes its own double as take-out. I don't think it unreasonable to assume that two GIBs at the same table would agree on the meaning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.