Hanoi5 Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 Pairs: ♠Jxx♥x♦AKJ9x♣A7xx 2♣(strong)-2♦(waiting, you didn't discuss much)2♥-3♦3NT-4♣5♣-? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhm Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 Pairs: ♠Jxx♥x♦AKJ9x♣A7xx 2♣(strong)-2♦(waiting, you didn't discuss much)2♥-3♦3NT-4♣5♣-?7♣ is out since a good player would have bid 4♠ over 4♣ if that contract would be reasonable. I would bid 5NT (pick a slam). I see the choice between 6♣ and 6NT. Rainer Herrmann 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 7♣ is out since a good player would have bid 4♠ over 4♣ if that contract would be reasonable. I would bid 5NT (pick a slam). I see the choice between 6♣ and 6NT. Rainer Herrmann Since I can think of only a tiny number of hand types where 6c will make and 6n has no playand another small set of hands where 6c has no play because the suit breaks badly and 6nmakes I will just go ahead and bid the MP top 6N and not worry about clubs at IMPS I wouldbe more inclined to offer a choice with 5N. Agree that 7 should be out of consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted October 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I never said either player was good. I'd like to know what you think opener holds and what LA would you prefer, 6♣ or 6NT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.