whereagles Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 Hi all, see if you get this one right. Venue: open team trials, training session. Thus top opponents, obviously. IMP scoring. [hv=pc=n&n=st643hq852dk876c9&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=p1cp1dp1hp2cp2sp3dp3nppp]133|200[/hv]Auction:1♣ = either (1) natural 4+ cards unbalanced or (2) preparatory with balanced 12-14 H (can be 2+ clubs).1♦ = 4+ hearts.1♥ = 3 hearts, normally min hand.2♣ = GF relay.2♠ = nat.3♦ = stopper ask. Yer lead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 small D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles123 Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 spade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinksy Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 Small ♦ for me. A passed P's unlikely to have good enough ♣s to set the contract, and with LHO sounding balanced, P shouldn't have more than 3Ss, just in case I was feeling fanciful. If the D lead carves a trick, we probably weren't ever setting it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Molyb Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 small diamond for me too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 Hello I chose that: Declarer had 13-18 HCP. Outside that range he would either have made some further slam move or not game forced.Declarer had fewer than 5 Spades and precisely 4 Hearts, or would have played in known major fit. Not guaranteed but close enough.Declarer had fewer than 2 of top 3 honours in D (to justify asking)Dummy had at least 1 of top 3 honours in D (to justify accepting)Dummy had 12-14 bal with 4 Spades and 3 Hearts.Partner completely random in context. Dealt 10000 matching deals (took 15812246 deals to achieve it). D/D result of alternative leads are: Lead ........ % set ......... Expected tricks D8 ...........8.18% ......... 2.70C9 ......... 6.16% ............ 2.59DK ........ 6.02% ............ 2.32S4 ........ 5.66% ............ 2.60S6 ........ 5.64% ............ 2.60ST ........ 4.51% ............ 2.51H5 ........ 3.38% ............ 2.35H2 ........ 3.37% ............ 2.35H8 ........ 3.00% ............ 2.30HQ ........ 1.15% ............ 1.93 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted September 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 @1eyedjack: your constraints are a bit confusing. Opener is the declarer.. I think you got it the other way around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 @1eyedjack: your constraints are a bit confusing. Opener is the declarer.. I think you got it the other way around. You are right. My bad. I have swapped declarer and dummy in the previous example and re-run. Dealt 10000 matching deals (took 15674724 deals to achieve it). D/D result of alternative leads are: Lead ........ % set ......... Expected tricks D8 ...........6.15% ......... 2.61C9 ......... 5.34% ............ 2.57S4 ........ 4.93% ............ 2.57S6 ........ 4.86% ............ 2.56DK ........ 4.50% ............ 2.20H2 ........ 3.30% ............ 2.41H5 ........ 3.23% ............ 2.40ST ........ 3.00% ............ 2.33H8 ........ 2.68% ............ 2.35HQ ........ 1.60% ............ 2.18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Molyb Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 @1eyedjack: in which scenarios would the ♠4 lead gain over the ♠6? :huh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 @1eyedjack: in which scenarios would the ♠4 lead gain over the ♠6? :huh: Hmm, I could have exported the output into a pbn file, loaded it into DDS, filtered the 10K hands as much as possible and then hunted through the remainder, for what appears to be the single hand that makes a difference, based on the spread of %. Not going to attempt that. Not sure that I can reproduce the data if I fail to pbn it first time. That is a more interesting point, actually, and will look into it. Need to be able to save the random number seed in the .ini file. My guess is that declarer had 4 card Spade suit including the Spade 5. Leading the 6 somehow promoted the 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted September 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 So that seems to have settled it: diamond is the winner. And it is so in practice, because opponents had ♦Jx in dummy opposite declarer's "stopper" which consisted of ♦Qx tight :) If you were to "try" for something more fancy, like leading the club 9 on grounds that pard "could have doubled 3♦ with ♦AT9xx", you'd end up seeing declarer making an overtrick :) Two things warn against this: (1) pard is a passed hand, so you're probably not going to beat this on a passive lead, and (2) partner had a chance to double the 2♣ relay with a bunch of those. Thx all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.