Jump to content

Forcing or no Forcing?


Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&n=sakqt8h82da96ca95&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=1sp1np2np3sp]133|200[/hv]

 

sys 2/1.now s bid 3s Forcing or no Forcing?

 

 

Forcing to me.

One may argue that this should show a very weak support and started with 1 NT and trying to stop on a dime, but then I think you will disable yourself from bidding 3 with 3 card limit raise bids vs a 18-19 hcp hand which is borderline slam hands.

At MP you may use it NF I guess, since going plus is more important than seeking slams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, if I have started with 1NT (Forcing) because I have a balanced three-card limit raise for spades, I'm bidding either 3NT or 4 at my second call. If I started with 1NT forcing because I haven't got a game force, I pass 2NT, unless given partner's extras I see a game. Anything other than pass is forcing, unless I'm playing Wolff signoff or something.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First question, which raises are go via a 1NT response, only the inv. raise

or the grap raise with 4-7 and fit.

 

If only the inv. raise, 3S is forcing, 3S should show a fit, without a fit,

why try to play a level higher, to be sucessful, this needs to play at least

2 tricks better.

If the grap raise is part of the 1NT raise, there is a case for NF, but with

22-25 and a major suit fit, I want to play game, NF may make sense at MP, not

so much at IMPs.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...