Jump to content

High level sac v partscore


1eyedjack

Recommended Posts

[hv=sn=1eyedjack&s=SAJHQ95DKJ7CAK843&wn=Robot&w=SQ9742HJ8763DAQCT&nn=Robot&n=ST85HK42DT965CJ75&en=Robot&e=SK63HATD8432CQ962&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1N2D!(Cappelletti%20-%20majors%20--%205+%20%21H%3B%205+%20%21S%3B%2011+%20total%20points)P2S(My%20better%20major%20--%203+%20%21S%3B%2010-%20total%20points)3C(5-%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2017%20HCP%3B%20r)PP3S(3+%20%21S%3B%203-10%20total%20points)PP4C(3+%20%21C%3B%208-%20total%20points)PPP&p=H6H2HTHQCACTC5C2CKS2C7C6DKDAD5D4HJHKHAH5CQC3H3CJC9C4S7H4S6SJSQS5H7D6D8H9DJDQD9D2H8S8D3C8D7S9DTS3STSKSAS4]400|300[/hv]

 

MP, best hand south, instant, pro gib 30

 

Trusting that my having a point to spare for the 1N opener does not qualify this as a "joke" post, I am interested to know whether you think it can ever be right, at any vul or any form of scoring, to sacrifice at the 4 level with a 3-3-4-3 shape and 4 HCP opposite a 1N opener.

 

Which, incidentally, netted 60.7% but only because opps forgot to double.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't say "ever," but very rarely would be accurate. And I would not make the bid in the hopes that this was one of those rare instances.

 

You could have done a trick better in the play as it turns out, but that is a quibble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may have been able to do a trick better in the play as it turns out (depending on the defense), but that is a quibble.

At D/D, there is no point at which I am on play where I have an option to go fewer than 3 down, and no point at which defence are on play where they have an option to take it more than 3 down. Possibly at single dummy (or if I alone was playing double dummy) I could have given them a losing option, but interested to know what you have in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At D/D, there is no point at which I am on play where I have an option to go fewer than 3 down, and no point at which defence are on play where they have an option to take it more than 3 down. Possibly at single dummy (or if I alone was playing double dummy) I could have given them a losing option, but interested to know what you have in mind.

When you played the trump A and saw the 10 appear on your left, you could have played that to be a singleton. Now, drive out the top diamonds as you did, unblocking from hand. The defense may be able to score a heart ruff - but if they do not, you can pick up the trump suit for one loser. In any event, you are no worse off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The description of 3 is also suspect: I'd want it to show 5, not 5-, which also eliminates the possibility of having 5 in any other suit.

 

That would be improved in v31.

 

So when 1NT person is bidding own suit in similar auction ( partner is silent ) it will say 5cards and not 5-.

 

Also aside suits would be reduced to some balanced length instead of 2-5 elsewhere.

 

I.e. 3 here would show : -- 5 ; 2-3 ; 2-4 ; 2-4 ; 17 HCP; 18- total points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...