1eyedjack Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 [hv=sn=1eyedjack&s=SQT86HKJ2DQJ74CA8&wn=Robot&w=SK94HQT987DT86C92&nn=Robot&n=SJ72H65DAK52CKQT3&en=Robot&e=SA53HA43D93CJ7654&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=1D(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20%21D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B)P2D!(Inverted%20minor%20suit%20raise%20--%204+%20%21D%3B%203-%20%21H%3B%203-%20%21S%3B%2010+%20HCP%3B%20forcing%20to%202N)P2N(2-5%20%21C%3B%203-5%20%21D%3B%202-4%20%21H%3B%202-4%20%21S%3B%2011-14%20HC)PPP&p=HTH5HAH2H4HJHQH6H9S2H3HKD4D8DAD3DKD9D7DTD2C4DQD6DJS4D5S5CAC2C3C5C8C9CKC7CQC6S6H7SJSAS8S9CJSTH8CTS3SQSKS7]400|300[/hv] MP, best hand South, Instant, pro GIB 30 Notwithstanding that I only made 8 tricks, with Hearts and Clubs both misbehaving and best opening lead, I don't think that North should settle for a part-score opposite an opening bid, even if that opener does reveal itself to be a minimum weak NT. I wonder whether it would have passed at IMP. Any way to tell? (Obviously not the most bizarre of GIB actions to be posted here of late) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Thanks for reporting. GIB wasn't intended to pass, has to bid 3NT, but after second thought ( simming ) its picked to pass. Fixed this in v31. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Should (or does) the description of 2N include showing stops in both majors? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 2NT shows -> -- 2-5 ♣; 3-5 ♦; 2-4 ♥; 2-4 ♠; 11-14 HCP; 12+ total points; partial stop in ♣; partial stop in ♥; partial stop in ♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.