Jump to content

responding to a weak nt


Recommended Posts

In an ideal world you could invite in diamonds somehow, if parnter rejected I doubt 3N would be very good. If your methods do not allow that then just bidding 3N is definitely better than signing off in 3D.

 

agreed. big hand in , if p has some sort of fit 3N will be there, but if not you still want to be in

 

whats 2 followed by 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is acting as if the opponents are not at the table.

 

I would bid 3 to play - ostensibly preemptive. On the vast majority of hands, 3 will be your best contract. It also makes it more difficult for your opps to get into the auction. They have 16-18 HCP - if they have some distribution, they may have a playable contract.

 

If you have to bid 2 to get to 3, this is an annoyance. It allows the opps to double to get into the auction. But if that is the way it is, you don't have any choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12=14 nt do not easily allow for minor suit invites since by their

nature it is unusual for them to have al suits stopped anyway. A

direct 3n here seems best ay IMPS since 5d is a long way off even

if 3n has no play. While 3d rates to be a safer contract, going for

the game bonus seems right at IMPS.

 

St MP a direct bid of 3n is reasonable but another good idea is

2N. The main reason for the invite is it keeps us in the best scoring

contract even if opener declines the invite. Trying to play in 3d at

MP just seems wrong and such a tactic would be much better served at

IMPS if one is feeling particularly conservative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...