A simple bidding

[Fluffy]

http://www.bridgegod....php?probid=273

 

After you play the board, wich isn't really tough, try to make the alternative contracts:

 

of 6NT and 7 diamonds

 

[Cyberyeti]

Nice problem, I don't like the way you bid it, but that's maybe me not understanding 2/1

 

 

 

 

My auctions started 1♦-1♥-1♠-2♣-2♦-3♦ and now I would bid 3N not 3♠ with half a club stop, a minimum hand and only 5-4 in the others. I pictured the hand as 5-6 at this point not being somebody who opens 1♠ with that, also when over 3♠ I bid 4♣ I would bid 4♦ with a minimum and no heart control (if partner doesn't bid 4♥ we have no slam) rather than show extras and probably a stiff heart with 4♠.

 

6♦ can be done in lots of ways, I lost the first trick and then ruffed spades.

 

6N is simple enough on the squeeze and I think I'd make that at the table.

 

7♦ is simple enough when you've seen the lie of the land from trying the previous contracts, but not sure I'd make it at the table. Also everybody leads trumps against grands :)

 

 

[Fluffy]

Didn't you cick on the 1♠ alert? it says 4 spades, not 4+ :)

 

I also though 3NT was a great bid from north, but I was lazy and bid 3♠, the reason? otherwise I would had to program another strain for NT played from north.

[Cyberyeti]

Didn't you cick on the 1♠ alert? it says 4 spades, not 4+ :)

 

I also though 3NT was a great bid from north, but I was lazy and bid 3♠, the reason? otherwise I would had to program another strain for NT played from north.

 

I did click on the alert to see the "could be balanced", but misread it as 4+/4+

 

You really have to open 1♠ with Jxxxx, x, AKQJ109, x ? and play 2♠ opposite x, KJxx, xx, Qxxxxx ?

[Fluffy]

I haven't been dealt that one yet :), 7-5 I open 1♦, don't remember many of those, I don't think any of them had a constructive bidding.