Jump to content

Gib uses TP for 3NT contract?


lycier

Recommended Posts

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=S32HA852DAQ954CA9&wn=机器人&w=SKT5HKQJ96DK72CT7&nn=机器人&n=S976HT43DJ863CKJ5&en=机器人&e=SAQJ84H7DTCQ86432&d=w&v=n&b=&a=1H(Major%20suit%20opening%20--%205+%20%21H%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)P1S(One%20over%20one%20--%204+%20%21S%3B%206+%20total%20points)P1N(2-3%20%21C%3B%202-3%20%21D%3B%205%20%21H%3B%202-3%20%21S%3B%2012-14%20HCP)P3N(4+%20%21S%3B%2017-%20HCP%3B%2013+%20total%20points)PPP&p=C5C2CAC7DAD2D6DTD5DKD8C8STS6S8S2S5S9SQS3SAH2SKS7SJH5H6D3S4H8D7CJH7HAH9HTDQCTDJC6D9HJH3C3D4HQH4C4C9HKCKCQ]499|350[/hv]

 

By "Combined" I mean between player + robot, combined.

 

But yes, I believe GIB uses HCP for NT contracts, and TP for suit.

 

I think I'll change my point to say this.

 

Strangely,3NT is alerted as " 4+,17-hcp,13+total points".

Gib E uses Total Points for 3NT instead of HCP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it has been something of a bugbear of mine.

 

Although in my case it is usually a raise of a minor suit. I have some sympathy, because in my cases (minor suit raises) it *IS* after all raising a suit. The problem with that is that in the case of a constructive minor suit raise, or even a pre-emptive raise opposite a powerhouse, the practical reality is that the game contract in you sights is almost always 3N, for which HCP, not TP, is relevant. Not an easy problem to solve.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...