lycier Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 [hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=ST8742HAJ3DJ75CT3&wn=机器人&w=SAKHKQ92DAT64CAK9&nn=shisun&n=S5HT865D9832CJ752&en=机器人&e=SQJ963H74DKQCQ864&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=PPP2C(Strong%20two%20club%20--%2019+%20HCP%3B%2023+%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20to%202N)P2D(2D%20bid%20waiting%20--%2011-%20HCP%3B%2012-%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20to%202N)P2N(Balanced%20minimum%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2022-24%20HCP%3B%2023+%20total%20points)P3H!(Jacoby%20transfer%20--%205+%20%21S%3B%2011-%20HCP%3B%2012-%20total%20points)P3S(Transfer%20completed%20to%20S%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2022-24%20HCP%3B%2023+%20total%20points)P5N(5%20%21S%3B%209-11%20HCP%3B%2012-%20total%20points)P7S(Accepted%20-%20having%20two%20of%20top%20three%20honors%20--%202-5%20%21C%3B%202-5%20%21D%3B%202-5%20%21H%3B%202-5%20%21S%3B%2022-24%20HCP%3B%20%21SKQ%3B%2023+%20total%20points)PPP&p=S5S3S2SASKD2S6S4C9C2CQC3SQS7H9D8SJS8H2D3S9STDTH6HAHQH5H7H3HKH8H4D6D9DKD5C8CTCAC5D4HTDQD7C6HJCKC7DACJC4DJ]499|350[/hv] 5nt should be a quantitive bid with 9-11hcp,7♠ says 22-24hcp. Now let's make a simple calculation : 24hcp + 11 hcp =35hcp,35hcp is not strong enough to bid up to 7♠. Obviously,Gib overvalued this hand,Gib need to have better bidding rules or what else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manudude03 Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 It looks as if GiB W has taken 5NT as Grand Slam Force rather than Pick-a-slam. Nothing to do with evaluation, just system. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antrax Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Yeah, I reported this bug before, too: http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/57308-alert-mismatch/This similar issue was fixed:http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/66076-another-buggy-sequence/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotShot Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I would guess that GIB came to the conclusion that to have 9-11 HCP the ♥A is very likely to be with E. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 This similar issue was fixed:http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/66076-another-buggy-sequence/"was fixed" in the sense that it has been fixed on Georgi's computer and will (presumably) be included in the next update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I would guess that GIB came to the conclusion that to have 9-11 HCP the ♥A is very likely to be with E.Likely enough to justify bidding 7 when East has 9-11 of the missing 17 HCP? No. Manudude's explanation seems more likely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manudude03 Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 Guys, the explanation of 7S even says 2 of the top 3 honors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Guys, the explanation of 7S even says 2 of the top 3 honors. yes is a bug 5N explanation invitational with only 5♠ but west is taking 5N as grand slam force Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted June 16, 2014 Report Share Posted June 16, 2014 Thanks. That was fixed in v30 ( Current one in production ). Now 5NT carries just quantitative invite. Little higher as requirement and 7M is not longer chained with honors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.