32519 Posted May 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2014 [hv=pc=n&s=saq98632hadakqj2c&n=s4hqt9842d9865c93&d=e&v=0&b=14&a=1n(12-14%20HCP)2n(Alerted%20by%20North)p3dp7dppp]266|200[/hv]The 2NT bid from South was alerted by North as - 1. Both minors, OR2. Any big 2-suited hand East led a club, trumped in dummy. Declarer then played ♠A and a small ♠ trumped in hand. When the ♠K fell doubleton, declarer claimed for +1440. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinksy Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 Well it is a pity for you that YOU have to invent a convention like this. I'm not normally credited with the Unusual 2N, but thanks. Others who discuss sequences with their partners already play 2NT as any big 2 suiter. I'm sure some of them do. I don't believe for a second it's universal, and neither do you. So let's focus on the interesting case when we're not playing it. Just a question - personally I don't necessarily see anyone running after a double, and after you have cashed your Ds, what are you going to do? I'm going to lead a D, then look at the table, the state of the match, and make a decision. Yes, if it gets that far I'll have done badly in expectation. I still do not believe the chances of the X being passed out are much higher than 10%.* Let’s look at the actual hand, which I believe you advocate doing whenever it helps your cause: responder has at least 6Cs and at most 6 points, so he’ll pull. I now have a suit to cue, so I can keep doing so until advancer admits to having a D side suit, after which I can bid 7. If by some miracle he doesn't pull, P will, which makes life harder, but no more so than it was before I Xed. * Actually, I’m struggling to think of any lie of cards where an X is odds-on to be passed out. Someone at the table has 5Cs. If responder has them that should be an auto-pull, if P has them I’d expect him to pull unless he has decent values (in which case, as responder, even with a 4333, given a 0-2 count I’d expect him to wriggle out of desperation), if opener has them and receives a non-forcing pass (if his P had a natural XX available), he’s likely to bid them unless they’re particularly weak – in which case chances are P will be getting in with them to return a S. Much the same goes for the H suit unless it's exactly 444 in the other hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 I'm not normally credited with the Unusual 2N, but thanks. I'm sure some of them do. I don't believe for a second it's universal, and neither do you. So let's focus on the interesting case when we're not playing it. I'm going to lead a D, then look at the table, the state of the match, and make a decision. Yes, if it gets that far I'll have done badly in expectation. I still do not believe the chances of the X being passed out are much higher than 10%.* Let’s look at the actual hand, which I believe you advocate doing whenever it helps your cause: responder has at least 6Cs and at most 6 points, so he’ll pull. I now have a suit to cue, so I can keep doing so until responder admits to having a D side suit, after which I can bid 7. If by some miracle he doesn't pull, P will, which makes life harder, but no more so than it was before I Xed. * Actually, I’m struggling to think of any lie of cards where an X is odds-on to be passed out. Someone at the table has 5Cs. If responder has them that should be an auto-pull, if P has them I’d expect him to pull unless he has decent values (in which case, as responder, even with a 4333, given a 0-2 count I’d expect him to wriggle out of desperation), if opener has them and receives a non-forcing pass (if his P had a natural XX available), he’s likely to bid them unless they’re particularly weak – in which case chances are P will be getting in with them to return a S. Much the same goes for the H suit unless it's exactly 444 in the other hands. Here we have a problem. You do not know what an UNT is. " I don't believe for a second it's universal, and neither do you. So let's focus on the interesting case when we're not playing it." This would not be the case as this is a sequence I have discussed with my partners of course. If you haven't I would suggest you don't play seriously. "Let’s look at the actual hand, which I believe you advocate doing whenever it helps your cause: responder has at least 6Cs and at most 6 points, so he’ll pull. I now have a suit to cue, so I can keep doing so until responder admits to having a D side suit, after which I can bid 7. "I suggest you look at the hand again while playing the Barcarole from Offenbach's "Tales of Hoffman" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinksy Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 "Let’s look at the actual hand, which I believe you advocate doing whenever it helps your cause: responder has at least 6Cs and at most 6 points, so he’ll pull. I now have a suit to cue, so I can keep doing so until responder admits to having a D side suit, after which I can bid 7. "I suggest you look at the hand again while playing the Barcarole from Offenbach's "Tales of Hoffman" Can you give an actual argument, just in case I don't have the access to divine revelation you enjoy? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.