Jump to content

another balancing preempt


Fluffy

Recommended Posts

I'm quite tempted to bid 2 on grounds that pard may be too weak to act (he's short on hearts, yet he passed).

 

If I dbl and pard signs off in 3 (direct or via Leb), I'm not gonna be too happy...

 

So 2 it is. If I'm right in that pard is weak, he won't go berserk over this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite tempted to bid 2 on grounds that pard may be too weak to act (he's short on hearts, yet he passed).

 

If I dbl and pard signs off in 3 (direct or via Leb), I'm not gonna be too happy...

 

So 2 it is. If I'm right in that pard is weak, he won't go berserk over this.

When I reason like this, partner will decide that I must be short in s, but I didn't reopen with a double, so my suit is likely 6 long, and his Qxx Jxx AQxxx Kx is too good for a raise to only 3, so 4 he will say. Did I mention the 5-1 break? :rolleyes:

 

I will try double to reopen, and prepare to defend that call in the following ATB inquest. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would double. This is partly because I don't play lebenshohl after a balancing double, so partner can bid a natural 2NT over it, meaning I am unlikely to stew in a 4-2 fit.

 

Look at it this way - when we have a takeout double (usually with 2 or fewer hearts) and there has been no raise, what kind of hand do we expect partner to have? One of his most likely hand types is a fairly balanced hand with about 9 or 10 points and something in their suit, yet most of us blithely continue to treat this as a lebensohl position.

 

I did a quick trawl through my database for this sequence, and I don't really have time to conduct and present a full analysis, but this hand caught my eye for obvious reasons (Brink/Drijver N/S Mihov/Karakolev E/W):[hv=pc=n&s=sk8642hqdat95cq32&w=saq95h832dkj62ca8&n=sthkj9765d4cj9765&e=sj73hat4dq873ckt4&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=2hppdp3dppp]399|300[/hv]

 

3 made in some comfort, but you have to concede that this was a lucky outcome for E/W.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would double. This is partly because I don't play lebenshohl after a balancing double, so partner can bid a natural 2NT over it, meaning I am unlikely to stew in a 4-2 fit.

 

Look at it this way - when we have a takeout double (usually with 2 or fewer hearts) and there has been no raise, what kind of hand do we expect partner to have? One of his most likely hand types is a fairly balanced hand with about 9 or 10 points and something in their suit, yet most of us blithely continue to treat this as a lebensohl position.

 

I did a quick trawl through my database for this sequence, and I don't really have time to conduct and present a full analysis, but this hand caught my eye for obious reasons (Brink/Drijver N/S Mihov/Karakolev E/W):[hv=pc=n&s=sk8642hqdat95cq32&w=saq95h832dkj62ca8&n=sthkj9765d4cj9765&e=sj73hat4dq873ckt4&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=2sppdp3dppp]399|300[/hv]

 

3 made in some comfort, but you have to concede that this was a lucky outcome for E/W.

 

I presume N actually opened 2.

 

Not sure what this hand proves, even with N having a hand with lots of extra shape/offence I think 2 can be beaten, much of the time you'll get 200 by just passing it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this hand pass was a big loser, partner has 6 diamonds and although opponents are cold for 4, nobody bid them. All other pairs played in some number of diamonds making 10 tricks, and even those on 5-1 beat 2 making.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...