luke warm Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 kat, i have absolutely no doubt that you're one of the good ones (regardless of your experience/expertise)... the ones who chap me are those who take totally ridiculous actions as if they actually have a clue... and then they really don't give a damn, after all people can always choose not to play... not a good enough remedy, imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 I hope you are right! You do have a point, shame more don’t read forum, lots of useful information and help to be had here. jillybean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSilver Posted May 23, 2005 Report Share Posted May 23, 2005 I know this is an old topic, but today in the USBC, Zia held ♠Kxxx ♥AKT9xx, ♦xx, ♣x, opposite Rosenberg's strong 1nt. Zia bid 2♣, then 3♥ over partner's 2♦, then corrected 3NT to 4♥. No one summoned the director, and Zia was permitted to finish the match. Some of the vugraph commentators suggested that it could be right to ignore the spade suit. Others offered the opinion that a slam in spades was posssible and should be explored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.