ahydra Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 ♠KQ♥KQJ♦AJ10x♣AJxx Playing MPs, NV vs V, partner opens 3H in second seat. Third seat passes. I reasoned that:- he wouldn't open 3H in that position with such poor hearts if he didn't have anything outside- someone must have spades, so I can likely make a spade ruff- after losing SA, other tricks come from 7 hearts, SK, spade ruff and AKA in minors 3S would be natural, 4C a cuebid. I opted to punt and went straight to 6H (asking for the keycard first, just in case...) Does that seem reasonable? ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 ♠KQ♥KQJ♦AJ10x♣AJxx Playing MPs, NV vs V, partner opens 3H in second seat. Third seat passes. I reasoned that:- he wouldn't open 3H in that position with such poor hearts if he didn't have anything outside- someone must have spades, so I can likely make a spade ruff- after losing SA, other tricks come from 7 hearts, SK, spade ruff and AKA in minors 3S would be natural, 4C a cuebid. I opted to punt and went straight to 6H (asking for the keycard first, just in case...) Does that seem reasonable? ahydra Ace 7th is way more than what i need for a 3 level preempt at these colors. This does not mean i would just sign off in game of course, Even a Q in a minor suit makes it a playable slam, not one that we are proud of but still.... This type of hands are nightmare hands for people like me who has wide range of preempts, i have to confess. But i do not employ my preempt style catering for monsters pd may hold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 This is a 4H bid. You may make 6, but you are more likely to go down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 This is a 4H bid. You may make 6, but you are more likely to go down. I'd rather worry about missing a grand than going down in 6 if preempt was made by you http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Playing MPs, NV vs V, ♠ K Q ♥ K Q J ♦ A J 10 x ♣ A J x xPartner opens 3H in second seat. Third seat passes. I reasoned that:- he wouldn't open 3H in that position with such poor hearts if he didn't have anything outside- someone must have spades, so I can likely make a spade ruff- after losing SA, other tricks come from 7 hearts, SK, spade ruff and AKA in minors.3S would be natural, 4C a cuebid. I opted to punt and went straight to 6H (asking for the keycard first, just in case...) Does that seem reasonable ahydra IMO 4♣ (if keycard) = 10, 4♥ = 9, 4N (RKC) = 8, 6♥ = 6. But depends on pre-empt style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Nah, I have given up trying to guess what 3H might look like to BBF'rs, but at these colors no way opposite my partner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 I'd rather worry about missing a grand than going down in 6 if preempt was made by you http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif One guy I played with occasionally would open 2H on Jxxx. 3H at this vul on TxxxxI played against him in a match and the bidding went 2♥ 2NT3♣ 3♦3H All pass and off 1Pd held a flat 23 count 2NT enquiry, 3C = bad, 3D = how bad, 3H = very bad. In case you think this guy is a patzer, David Bird modelled Bro Hermann in the Abbot series on him. Back to the original problem.Would not anyone open 3H nv vs vul on say xxxAxxxxxxxxx Even give the opener Q of C and it is on a hook or a squeeze, and how will you find out about the CQ?Normal KC is a waste of time as well. So you find out pd has one KC, so what? You are better placed if you play Weak KC responses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antrax Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 This type of hands are nightmare hands for people like me who has wide range of preempts, i have to confess. But i do not employ my preempt style catering for monsters pd may hold.Can't you just play something like Ogust/feature ask over 3-level preempts too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickyB Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 - You are much more likely to hold an 8-count than a 4-count a priori; this is especially true for shapely hands- Dealer passing increases the difference in relative frequencies It is unclear to me whether those who are saying they need very little for 3H here are advocating weak preempts (eg 3-7 points) or wide-ranging preempts (eg 3-9 points); I think the former is clearly bonkers [i'd prefer the higher frequency of 5-9] and the latter is questionable [will your 3H opening on QJxxxxx and out show a profit when partner plays the odds and assumes that you have an ace more?] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_clown Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 I would just bid 4♥. Even if partner has a great hand like xx A109xxxx Kxx x we still need to find the diamond queen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggwhiz Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 I'm with MickyB in that our pre-empts are as wide ranging as most but absolutely NOT in 2nd chair. That discussion makes it a "reasonable" punt but by no means clear cut especially at MP's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanoff Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 There's no need to punt but you're obviously worth a look.If 4♣ gets 4♦ you can try 4♠.With no further encouragement I'd give up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 Can't you just play something like Ogust/feature ask over 3-level preempts too? You can of course, but they will all come with a prize. I am sure BBF theoreticians may come up with some fancy stuff. I personally do not create things each time my system or style fails miserably. I know there are hands that are not friendly with my system or style, i accept them the way they are and just move on to the next board. If the system or style fails frequently, then it needs to be reconsidered of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I play 4♣ short ask and 4♦ ace ask, don't think they will solve the problem here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmcilkley Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 In 1st or 2nd seat I like a preempt to be a good suit, 2 of the top 3 honours - for exactly this reason Partner has not passed and may have a big hand and if the preempt could be weak he will not know how to proceed.If a partner I trusted opened 3h on this, missing K, Q and J, then I would wonder what was going on. Maybe he also has an ace. Axx in spades as well as A 7 times in hearts would make a sure slam so I would certainly go looking for it with 4nt and expect to hear 2 keycards. Surely h could not also have a K in a minor as with 10 points and 7 hearts he would open 1h. So the grand can;t be on. ♠KQ♥KQJ♦AJ10x♣AJxx Playing MPs, NV vs V, partner opens 3H in second seat. Third seat passes. I reasoned that:- he wouldn't open 3H in that position with such poor hearts if he didn't have anything outside- someone must have spades, so I can likely make a spade ruff- after losing SA, other tricks come from 7 hearts, SK, spade ruff and AKA in minors 3S would be natural, 4C a cuebid. I opted to punt and went straight to 6H (asking for the keycard first, just in case...) Does that seem reasonable? ahydra 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I'd try to cuebid. The possible hands seem to include: 1. ♥ATxxxxx and out, game is the limit.2. ♥ATxxxxx and a side queen, slam is on a finesse at best (i.e. ♠xx ♥ATxxxxx ♦xx ♣Qx doesn't really offer any play)3. ♥ATxxxxx and a side king, slam is on a finesse at worst (i.e. ♠xxx ♥ATxxxxx ♦Kx ♣x is virtually cold).4. ♥ATxxxxx and the spade ace, slam is cold if spades are Axx and will have some play if spades are Ax. Seems like you basically want slam if partner has a side ace or king, and cuebidding will normally figure this out for you. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahydra Posted March 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 Partner's hand was xxx ATxxxxx Qx x. Lead SA and unfortunately the DK was offside this time. :( Trying 4C in the hope of 4D was probably safer - pity there's no cuebid available to check for clubs as well though. So... 1) should 3S be a cuebid / inviting cuebids, rather than NAT GF? After all, angling for 4M after a 3m opening is reasonable, but converting a major to a major doesn't gain much unless the other major has a better fit. 2) what is 3H-5H? ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Partner's hand was xxx ATxxxxx Qx x. Lead SA and unfortunately the DK was offside this time. :( Trying 4C in the hope of 4D was probably safer - pity there's no cuebid available to check for clubs as well though. So... 1) should 3S be a cuebid / inviting cuebids, rather than NAT GF? After all, angling for 4M after a 3m opening is reasonable, but converting a major to a major doesn't gain much unless the other major has a better fit. 2) what is 3H-5H? ahydra No 3S should be natural. This is FAR more useful.5H is bid slam if your Hearts are good.Serves you right for not playing weak key cards or for being a super optimist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antrax Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Serves you right for not playing weak key cards or for being a super optimist the wrong opponent holding the ♦K.FYP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 FYP So you would rather bash a slam, 50% at best, than find out if pd held the H ace and a minor suit K? Ok! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 I'd try to cuebid. The possible hands seem to include: 1. ♥ATxxxxx and out, game is the limit.2. ♥ATxxxxx and a side queen, slam is on a finesse at best (i.e. ♠xx ♥ATxxxxx ♦xx ♣Qx doesn't really offer any play)3. ♥ATxxxxx and a side king, slam is on a finesse at worst (i.e. ♠xxx ♥ATxxxxx ♦Kx ♣x is virtually cold).4. ♥ATxxxxx and the spade ace, slam is cold if spades are Axx and will have some play if spades are Ax. Seems like you basically want slam if partner has a side ace or king, and cuebidding will normally figure this out for you. This Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 I'd try to cuebid. The possible hands seem to include:1. ♥ATxxxxx and out, game is the limit.2. ♥ATxxxxx and a side queen, slam is on a finesse at best (i.e. ♠xx ♥ATxxxxx ♦xx ♣Qx doesn't really offer any play)3. ♥ATxxxxx and a side king, slam is on a finesse at worst (i.e. ♠xxx ♥ATxxxxx ♦Kx ♣x is virtually cold).4. ♥ATxxxxx and the spade ace, slam is cold if spades are Axx and will have some play if spades are Ax.Seems like you basically want slam if partner has a side ace or king, and cuebidding will normally figure this out for you. OK, awm convinces me (provided that you play that new suits are cue-bids, which, unfortunately, I don't) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 OK, awm convinces me (provided that you play that new suits are cue-bids, which, unfortunately, I don't)Me neither, but OP stated that 4♣ would be a cue http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif 3S would be natural, 4C a cuebid. I opted to punt and went straight to 6H (asking for the keycard first, just in case...) Does that seem reasonable? ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts