Jump to content

How To Make East Declarer


Recommended Posts

Over 3, I like 3 = heart fit + max and 3 = heart fit + min. That right sides it here but it is pretty random. Probably better is simply to start at the 4 level. Again there is the random effect of a natural 4 being great and getting to 4 via Texas being not so great. At least this way has kept them out though and on another hand that might result in their not finding the killing lead.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I play South African Texas over weak NT, so I can decide (at round 1) who gets to be declarer in 4. It's a little aggressive, but I'd probably do it; and I'd probably make me declarer (with the king to protect and hide how skinny it is). But I've seen all 4 hands.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

texas transfers are a valuable tool when it comes to possible slam

evaluation. I will let you look it up. The point being the east hand

has zero reason to be messing around with a normal jacoby sequence

and should have begun with a 4d bid immediately and this problem would

never seen the light of day (thank goodness it was a 3c bid and not a

2s bid from which your side probably never recovers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what's E dicking around for, there is no slam potential, there is only 1 possible contract, why let in a lead directional or sacrifice suggesting bid by S. Just bid 4

 

I sort of agree with this but not entirely, yes you might have 12 tricks opposite say xxx, AKx, xx, AQxxx but you're not going to find this one, the only reason for not just bidding 4 was that you weren't intending to bid game, just raise to 3 which could be right particularly at pairs, if I bid 4 partner will have QJx, xx, KQJ, Axxxx and I might not even make 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sort of agree with this but not entirely, yes you might have 12 tricks opposite say xxx, AKx, xx, AQxxx but you're not going to find this one, the only reason for not just bidding 4 was that you weren't intending to bid game, just raise to 3 which could be right particularly at pairs, if I bid 4 partner will have QJx, xx, KQJ, Axxxx and I might not even make 3.

4 will have some play opposite most weak NT. and if it doesn't its possible opp have 3 or 4

 

I don't personally play 3 as INV but is reasonable bid if I did.

 

im interested what you do with a GF and 5+ ? which is what i do for 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 will have some play opposite most weak NT. and if it doesn't its possible opp have 3 or 4

 

I don't personally play 3 as INV but is reasonable bid if I did.

 

im interested what you do with a GF and 5+ ? which is what i do for 3

 

GF and 5 hearts I rebid 3N (or new suit which is not GF at this point, but if I bid on over 3 it was a slam try), balanced slam invite I bid 4N (4 would ask KC)

 

GF and 6+ I bid 4, slam invite we play a 3 rebid over both 1N-2-2 and 1N-2-2 as a slam try in saying nothing about if I don't have a second suit, I bid the second suit if I have one, 1N-2-2-2 is F1 for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...