Jump to content

club fit, lack of stoppers


Recommended Posts

3 should be forcing (according to Mike Lawrence in Passed Hand Bidding, p. 106). Let further cuebidding get you in/out of 3N

Doesn't Lawrence very strongly recommend Drury? But anyhow if 2m is natural after passing it obviously shows a very limted range so 3m show be forcing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me also it would be Drury but of course that's not the case here. Anyway, I like to play that only 2, not 2, is Drury so just interchange the minors and you have the same issue. (yes, Lawrence strongly recommends Drury but like me he plays only clubs as Drury so make it the diamond suit and Lawrence will be right in there with us all.) I think it is just too difficult to play if the raise to 3 is not played as forcing. There is something a little off sounding about 1-2 -3-Pass, and I thinkit still sounds off if it is Pass- 1-2 -3-Pass.

 

Assume Pass-1-2 is constructive but not forcing. Why would I raise to 3 unless I had something extra? Of course you cannot be certain of where this belongs, but it seems to me that raising clubs announces extras and announces your values oar in spades and in clubs. As they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you just need LHO of opener to hold AKAK and cash them early for 3NT to make :). More seriously, if one is an opener, the other is a 1NT response, it takes real invitational values to do a 2/1. Add a random Jack for the example to be real.

 

Yes it is an overbid, but it solves your problems when you have AJxxx x AKx KJxx instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You haven't played much Acol then, what are you supposed to do with say AKxxx, x, xxx, KJxx opposite x, Qxxx, Qxx, AQ10xx

Pass 2? Not the toughest bidding problem I have ever seen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

passed hand cannot make natural forcing bids in virtually any system I have seen

(or imagine). If opener has no thought of being able to make 5m after your 2c

bid they should pass. Therefore a 3m raise should show enough values to at least

consider 5m and hopefully there is sufficient space to search for 3n along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass 2? Not the toughest bidding problem I have ever seen

 

In traditional Acol, 2 is forcing (2N would be natural, 1 only shows 4 so no bergen or similar) because it can be that your next bid was intended to be quite a few spades provided partner had 5, Qxx, Kxx, x, Axxxxx for example basically a hand just too good to bid 2 but not good enough to open.

 

And Fluffy, old style Acol gives a 2/1 on an 8 count, we require 10 (or a nice 9 with 5, basically any hand that will force to game opposite a strong notrump) so the hand I gave is a comfortable Acol 2/1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In traditional Acol, 2 is forcing (2N would be natural, 1 only shows 4 so no bergen or similar) because it can be that your next bid was intended to be quite a few spades provided partner had 5, Qxx, Kxx, x, Axxxxx for example basically a hand just too good to bid 2 but not good enough to open.

 

And Fluffy, old style Acol gives a 2/1 on an 8 count, we require 10 (or a nice 9 with 5, basically any hand that will force to game opposite a strong notrump) so the hand I gave is a comfortable Acol 2/1.

The more various acol bidders write about their methods, the happier I am that I am not playing them.

 

The notion of any 2/1 by a passed hand being forcing is absurd unless it promises a good fit for opener.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more various acol bidders write about their methods, the happier I am that I am not playing them.

 

The notion of any 2/1 by a passed hand being forcing is absurd unless it promises a good fit for opener.

 

I could not have said it better. Ironically Cyber's passed hands will be much weaker than yours. When you open as light as he does (see the topic when he and you disagreed on opening 1) it makes even less sense to disable opener from passing when pd is coming from pass.

 

I am not an Acol fan, and players like Cyber do not help me to change my mind. But i doubt the system is as bad as some players in BBF practices it. I am pretty sure if we listened to Andy or Frances or Wank or some other British player and their versions of bidding the hands in Acol system (i am pretty confident that they all know Acol regardless of what they prefer to play currently) we would have better understanding of the system, rather than the system being used as an excuse for bad judgement.

 

Same applies to 2/1 as well.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? Quote your source.

 

Actually in a sense you're right in that many old style Acol players will pass having opened a semi psyche in 3rd, but I think it's forcing opposite a real opening bid. Certainly if you don't play the old 8+ style.

 

Ironically Cyber's passed hands will be much weaker than yours.

 

Actually not true, my unbalanced passes will be weaker than yours, but we pass a lot of balanced 11s that Americans would open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...