Zelandakh Posted March 24, 2014 Report Share Posted March 24, 2014 As an aside, I wrote a Greasemonkey script to hide signatures on this forum.Could you not just uncheck "View members' signatures when reading topics?" under Profile->Forums? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antrax Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 I'm... I'm not sure how to feel just now. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Double seems right. 3 ♣ would have shown limit raise plus, 3 ♦ shows ♠ and values with presumably tolerance for ♥s. So 3 ♥ shows some competitive values and a fit, but what? Since responder isn't marked with a lot, I don't think double at this point is mandating that they defend. Rather I think it's more informatory that the responder's "constructive" values include some defense. It's important for responder to tell opener this because opener's 4 ♥ bid is somewhat ambiguous. Responder can't know whether opener's 4 ♥ was pushing to a thin game, bidding to make, or bidding on with a monster. Double simply tells responder's story and leaves the decision to opener. If instead of 3 ♥, responder had bid 3 ♣ showing values, a double in this situation would demand defending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.