Jump to content

1 loser hand


Recommended Posts

I was surprised to find myself with

 

X

AKQTXXXXX

AKQ

 

In a standard club night with hands dealt at the table

 

Bidding went

 

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3

 

Firstly is a standard 2 ok to start with (assume it is)

 

I continued

 

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -

 

From here I could have tried RCKB, but would have got 2 with the queen back so not sure if its AK or includes A

 

Are there any fairly common and easy to remember ways to find out specifically about the A, I don't want to introduce a massive memory drain as I doubt that I will see a similar situation more than 3 (or so) times again, but a simple addition would be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Oddie and welcome to the BBO forums.

 

A couple of simple possibilities: you could agree that 6 over 3 denies first round spade control while 3 followed by 6 shows it; or you could agree that 4 over 3 is similar to a SJS and sets diamonds as trumps. Then you can bid 5 next time around as XRKCB and effectively ask specifically about the A. In the general case, voids in partner's suit often cause problems for simple standard methods so it is not surprising that it was difficult for you to deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to prepose a method to deal with hands like this in the future, but a common treatment is playing 4NT over an opening bid as regular Blackwood (not keycards). It sounds like that you have no other ways of finding out if partner holds the ace of spades (with your current methods). If you get a one ace response to Blackwood, then you'd probably have to play it in 6 diamonds. If you get a two ace response, then you can bid the grand. Helenes way is also a possibility.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it worth giving up whatever your normal meaning is for a 3NT opening to play this to ask for spec. aces?

http://www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/kabel_3_no_trump_opening.html

 

Or there's always the 4NT opening to ask for spec. aces.

 

I see so many monster hands posted here and many don't arrive at the optimal contract since spec. aces can't be found or since someone has to guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it worth giving up whatever your normal meaning is for a 3NT opening to play this to ask for spec. aces?

http://www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/kabel_3_no_trump_opening.html

 

Or there's always the 4NT opening to ask for spec. aces.

 

I see so many monster hands posted here and many don't arrive at the optimal contract since spec. aces can't be found or since someone has to guess.

 

The OP is responder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised to find myself with

 

X

AKQTXXXXX

AKQ

 

In a standard club night with hands dealt at the table

 

Bidding went

 

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3

 

Firstly is a standard 2 ok to start with (assume it is)

 

I continued

 

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -

 

From here I could have tried RCKB, but would have got 2 with the queen back so not sure if its AK or includes A

 

Are there any fairly common and easy to remember ways to find out specifically about the A, I don't want to introduce a massive memory drain as I doubt that I will see a similar situation more than 3 (or so) times again, but a simple addition would be good.

I have the agreement with my partner that when going to slam and with a fit then 6X asks 3th round control to go to 7. Therefore this with be a dangerous hand for us. You need to be sure that you can tell partner to pass 6 (or bid 7) at some point. And that he knows that you have 's on your own and no 's.

I would have bid 6 iso 3. Afraid that partner will convert to if I go to 6 in any other way.

I think 3 was a dangerous bid. Doesn't it imply something in hearts? I would be scared partner may convert 6 to 6 after that bid.

I agree with this.

After partner's 4 you can try 5. If partner bids 5 now it hopefully means he has the ace.

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -(P)-5

(P) - 5-(p)-6

Can partner now think you are asking 3th round control for 7?

 

A couple of simple possibilities: you could agree that 6 over 3 denies first round spade control while 3 followed by 6 shows it

I think that I like this.

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -(P)-5

(P) - 5-(p)-6

Here 6 sounds as to play. Hopefully partner will understand it and not convert to 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that I like this.

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -(P)-5

(P) - 5-(p)-6

Here 6 sounds as to play. Hopefully partner will understand it and not convert to 6

I assume you mean:

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -(P)-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think 3 is a cuebid for hearts, but rather a choice of games looking for spade stopper.

 

Partner bids 4, either he has very long hearts or no spade stopper, which of them?, well if he had very long hearts he could had bid 4, by bdding 3 he wanted to involve you into the bidding. So lack of jump to 4 before could mean one of 2 things: he is looking for different strain or different level.

 

It is very hard that he was looking for a different level, there is just not enough points on the deck for him to look for slam, or at least it is very unlikely (unless he somehow though that 3 was a weak bid). So I supose he does not.

 

IMO he's got something like Jxx AKQ10xx x Jxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised to find myself with

 

X

AKQTXXXXX

AKQ

 

In a standard club night with hands dealt at the table

 

Bidding went

 

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3

 

Firstly is a standard 2 ok to start with (assume it is)

 

I continued

 

(P) - 1 - (P) - 2 (me 2/1)

(2) - 3 - (P) - 3

(P) - 4 -

 

From here I could have tried RCKB, but would have got 2 with the queen back so not sure if its AK or includes A

 

Are there any fairly common and easy to remember ways to find out specifically about the A, I don't want to introduce a massive memory drain as I doubt that I will see a similar situation more than 3 (or so) times again, but a simple addition would be good.

 

Just open with a direct Ace ask , 3nt for me. Wtp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think there is any scientific way to bid this.

 

1 - 2

2 - 6

?

 

Opener knows diamond bidder has no interest in hearts.

If opener has the ace in spades or clubs, he should

'know' it is the 13th trick and bid 7. That is

trusting partner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

How about using strong jump shift, cue bid and then bid 6 ? When you know what trumps to play your slam, why not?

 

If THEY had not interfered after your SJS, you may bid twice, truly setting trumps and asking for cue-bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think there is any scientific way to bid this.

 

1 - 2

2 - 6

?

 

Opener knows diamond bidder has no interest in hearts.

If opener has the ace in spades or clubs, he should

'know' it is the 13th trick and bid 7. That is

trusting partner.

 

It does't really work, it asks specifically the trump A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...