RunemPard Posted January 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 They are not exactly alike, but when I say them maybe they do sound more alike than they should. The Swedish word for small is liten and the word for jack is knekten. I have never had an issue with anybody mixing them up in the past when I said them, so I do not know. I would not be surprised if the opponents on the table actually heard me right and chose to ignore my partner taking the wrong card or were simply not paying attention. After all, they thought once they played a card it was too late. As for my partner, maybe in his mind I was already playing the jack. Mix that in with my not so great Swedish and he could easily hear me saying jack. When I wanted to have this corrected, the opponents simply said too late, the trick is over. At which point I explained that I was playing for one distribution of the cards and if it sits this way it makes. The first director was called at which point he said he had not played the board before really hearing the issue. (Walked in on me continuing my discussion to opps) Another silver tournament qualified director came and said it cannot be undone. I was so upset that I honestly never even thought about asking to see the law book. So after this the result was -2 doubled. But as I said earlier...I am truly not surprised if they both heard me call for a small properly and never mentioned it. I even thought that about this during the ruling... As for using the word "small", which I know many here absolutely hate. I see no problems with it. It is accepted here in any club as being the lowest possible and if you use it you absolutely must take the smallest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 Well, it didn't happen that often, and anyway I find it annoying when an opponent plays dummy's cards unless dummy has gone to the bar, so I wouldn't want to do this.i'm not suggesting that an opponent play dummy's cards, I'm suggesting that declarer do so. I think the situation I described is sufficient to invoke the second sentence of Law 45B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blahonga Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 They are not exactly alike, but when I say them maybe they do sound more alike than they should. The Swedish word for small is liten and the word for jack is knekten. Have you tried consistently asking for knekt (jack) instead of knekten (the jack)? This might help since the two words don't have the same number of syllables. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 i'm not suggesting that an opponent play dummy's cards, I'm suggesting that declarer do so. I think the situation I described is sufficient to invoke the second sentence of Law 45B.What do you mean, the defenders playing dummy's cards? What a bizarre idea. Why would they do that, and how does it help with a language issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 But as I said earlier...I am truly not surprised if they both heard me call for a small properly and never mentioned it. I even thought that about this during the ruling... I wouldn't worry about this. Better to hope that next time you get a director who knows what he is doing, and if you are in doubt have him read out the Law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 What do you mean, the defenders playing dummy's cards? What a bizarre idea. Why would they do that, and how does it help with a language issue?I misunderstood you. Apparently, you meant you don't like it when an opponent, as declarer, plays dummy's cards. I don't know why you would object to this; it's a perfectly legal procedure, so long as there's a good reason for it. Dummy not understanding what cards you've instructed him to play is a good reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 I misunderstood you. Apparently, you meant you don't like it when an opponent, as declarer, plays dummy's cards. I don't know why you would object to this; it's a perfectly legal procedure, so long as there's a good reason for it. Dummy not understanding what cards you've instructed him to play is a good reason. I don't like it when there is no good reason, because it blocks my view of my partner's card and anyway I find it intrusive. I also don't like playing the cards myself every hand. I had a partner who went for a fag every single time he was dummy, and it made the game much less enjoyable for me. Obviously it is different at rubber bridge, where you play the cards into the middle and don't have to keep the hands intact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Couldn't you just omit the word for "small" and call the suit, knowing that dummy is to play the lowest card in the suit when the rank is not specified? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 It's not quite as simple as saying that the TD was definitely wrong, tell him to read from the Lawbook next time.The TD has to decide which of these two possibilities is correct: You originally meant to call for a small card, but you had a slip of the brain and in fact you did call for the JackYou called for a small card, mis-heard by dummy as the Jack In the latter case, you can change it (as various people have said)In the former case, you can't. If 3 people at the table said they heard you call for the Jack, then the TD is likely to rule that is what happened, even though you 'know' that you didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunemPard Posted January 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 The other two players never said I called for the jack...they said I cannot have it changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunemPard Posted January 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Couldn't you just omit the word for "small" and call the suit, knowing that dummy is to play the lowest card in the suit when the rank is not specified? I do this often, but at the time I just called for small. I will be trying to say a (suit name) more often though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Last night at the club, there was a moment when declarer called for "heart ace", but the rest of us thought it sounded kind of like "club ace". The only ace in dummy was in hearts, nor was there a club 8, hearts were trump and declarer was obviously in the midst of drawing trumps. I think dummy gave him a quizzical look and confirmed that he meant heart, then we all just laughed it off as a weird occurrence. "heart" and "club" don't really have any sounds in common -- I think he just said it kind of quietly, with poor enunciation, so it could have been almost anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 "heart" and "club" don't really have any sounds in common but "trump ace" and "club ace" do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pran Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Last night at the club, there was a moment when declarer called for "heart ace", but the rest of us thought it sounded kind of like "club ace". The only ace in dummy was in hearts, nor was there a club 8, hearts were trump and declarer was obviously in the midst of drawing trumps. I think dummy gave him a quizzical look and confirmed that he meant heart, then we all just laughed it off as a weird occurrence. "heart" and "club" don't really have any sounds in common -- I think he just said it kind of quietly, with poor enunciation, so it could have been almost anything. but "trump ace" and "club ace" do. I trust that barmar would not have used the word "heart" in his post if declarer had used the word "trump" ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Now that I think about it some more, I think his pronunciation of "heart" was kind of like "huh" (we're in the Boston area, so pronouncing trailing R's is illegal). Since H is not a strong sound, what we mostly heard was the vowel -- "uh ace". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 All these threads about dummy and/or opponents mishearing declarer's designations remind me of how they addressed this in a different, more critical field of endeavor. If you've ever wondered by airplane pilots and control towers say "niner" instead of "nine", it's because the latter sounds just like the German word "nein".It is also why the number 5 is omitted from countdowns in the army (et al), since this could be mistaken for the word "Fire!" with unpleasant consequences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 It is also why the number 5 is omitted from countdowns in the army (et al), since this could be mistaken for the word "Fire!" with unpleasant consequences.They found out the hard way that "fiver" didn't solve the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Countdowns are one thing, but what if you are speaking phonetically and need to mention the number five? The way I learned it, you say "fife". And I never heard of omitting the number five from countdowns, but then I only spent three years in the army, and the question never came up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pran Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 For what it is Worth:In the Norwegian armed forces (signals) we are supposed to always precede numbers with a word that can best be translated into English as "numbersign". And we may only use the Norwegian words for the digits zero thru nine and the digit goups 00 (spoken as "hundred") and 000 (spoken as thousand). So transmitting the number 2300000 we say: "numbersign two three thousand hundred" (or possibly "numbersign two three hundred thousand").But for instance using the word "twentythree" is banned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 An issue when I went to India - their historical system works in groups of hundreds, not thousands (except the first); so they will write a number as 1 00 000 (one lakh) and 2 00 00 000 (two crore) - which is surprisingly difficult for someone used to American numbering to get used to (well, for someone == me, I guess). They continue that with numbers; so it's 4 double-3 36 double-zero. That also takes some getting used to when it's listening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 It is also why the number 5 is omitted from countdowns in the army (et al), since this could be mistaken for the word "Fire!" with unpleasant consequences.Ever see the movie "The Bedford Incident", with Richard Widmark as the CO of a US Destroyer? The USN used to use this movie as an example of how not to lead. B-) Widmark, to reporter: "If he fires one, I'll fire one."ASROC operator, on the other side of the bridge: "Fire one, aye, sir!" Woosh! Oops. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.